Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598420›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Treatment-Emergent Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Clinicopathological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of 94 Cases.

Qingfu Zhang, Yunan Han, Yao Zhang, Dan Liu, Jian Ming, Bo Huang, Xueshan Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advances in neuroendocrine prostate cancer research: From model construction to molecular network analyses.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qingfu ZhangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yunan HanDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Yao ZhangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Dan LiuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jian MingDepartment of Pathology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Bo HuangDepartment of Pathology, The Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xueshan QiuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
China Medical University · CNGeneral Hospital of Shenyang Military Region · CNLiaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the pathological characteristics, immunophenotype, and prognosis of treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (T-NEPC). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected 231 repeated biopsy specimens of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cases between 2008 and 2019. We used histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluations of Synaptophysin (SYN), ChromograninA (CgA), CD56, androgen receptor (AR), and prostate

resultsAmong the 231 CRPC cases, 94 (40.7%) cases were T-NEPC. T-NEPC were more likely to present with negative immunohistochemistry for AR (30.9%) and PSA (47.9%) than that of CRPC (8.8% and 17.5%, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with T-NEPC (median overall survival [OS]: 17.6 months, 95% CI: 15.3-19.9 months) had significantly worse survival compared with usual CRPC patients (median OS: 23.6 months, 95% CI: 21.3-25.9 months, log-rank

conclusionT-NEPC was associated with an unfavorable prognosis, negative immunohistochemistry for PSA in T-NEPC and serum PSA level ≤ 4 ng/ml had a worse prognosis. Urologists and pathologists should recognize the importance of the second biopsy in CRPC to avoid unnecessary diagnosis and treatment delays.

Indexed as

castration-resistant prostate cancerimmunohistochemistrySEER programsmall cell carcinomatreatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33598420
PMCPMC7882702
OpenAlexW3127128644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.