Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598336›Full record

ArticleAllergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)

Evaluation of In-Office Cryoablation of Posterior Nasal Nerves for the Treatment of Rhinitis.

John A Gerka Stuyt, Lauren Luk, David Keschner, Rohit Garg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cryoablation for the treatment of chronic rhinitis: a systematic review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Clinical Efficacy of TM02Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John A Gerka StuytDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Orange County, California.
Lauren LukDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Orange County, California.
David KeschnerDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Orange County, California.
Rohit GargDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Orange County, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5672-1689
Kaiser Permanente Orange County Irvine Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic rhinitis is a common condition generally treated with medical therapies. However, 10-22% of patients are refractory to medical therapies. A cryotherapy handheld device targeting the postganglionic nerve fibers of the posterior nasal nerve (PNN) now serves as an additional option for therapy. This study evaluates the efficacy of the cryosurgical ablation device of the PNN in the clinic setting.

methodsThis was a prospective single-arm trial of 24 adult patients at seven locations within a large health maintenance organization. Patients with chronic rhinitis that failed medical therapy were offered an in-office cryoablation of PNN. Patients completed the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) questionnaire consisting of 5 items reported based on the previous 12 hours and 2 weeks at the following time points: pre-treatment, 30 days, 90 days and 1 year post-treatment.

resultsFollowing cryoablation of the PNN, the TNSS 12-hour symptom score improved from 6.92 (±2.9) to 3.17 (±2.4, P < 0.001) at 30 days, 2.92 (±1.4, P < 0.001) at 90 days and 3.08 (±2.6, P < 0.001) at 1 year post treatment. Similar results were noted for the 2 weeks scores improving from 7.75 (±3.1) to 3.79 (±2.1, P < 0.001) at 30 days, 3.88 (±1.9, P < 0.001) at 90 days and 3.76 (±2.1, P < 0.001) at 1 year post-treatment. 64.7% of respondents stated the procedure decreased or eliminated nasal sprays.

conclusionsOur independent evaluation of cryoablation of the PNN shows improvement in nasal symptoms over a 1 year period and is consistent with other published data.

Indexed as

congestioncryoablationcryosurgerycryosurgical ablationposterior nasal nerverhinitisrhinorrhea

Identifiers

PMID33598336
PMCPMC7863162
OpenAlexW3128868390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.