ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021
Genomic pan-cancer classification using image-based deep learning.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Hybrid deep learning framework for accurate classification of high dimensional genomic data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Demystifying the black box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Computational models for pan-cancer classification based on multi-omics data.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- AI support for colonoscopy quality control using CNN and transformer architectures.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Real-time deep-learning NICE classification and withdrawal-speed monitoring for colorectal endoscopy.Digital healthArticle
- PRADclass: Hybrid Gleason Grade-Informed Computational Strategy Identifies Consensus Biomarker Features Predictive of Aggressive Prostate Adenocarcinoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate cancer type classification based on genetic mutation can significantly facilitate cancer-related diagnosis. However, existing methods usually use feature selection combined with simple classifiers to quantify key mutated genes, resulting in poor classification performance. To circumvent this problem, a novel image-based deep learning strategy is employed to distinguish different types of cancer. Unlike conventional methods, we first convert gene mutation data containing single nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions and deletions into a genetic mutation map, and then apply the deep learning networks to classify different cancer types based on the mutation map. We outline these methods and present results obtained in training VGG-16, Inception-v3, ResNet-50 and Inception-ResNet-v2 neural networks to classify 36 types of cancer from 9047 patient samples. Our approach achieves overall higher accuracy (over 95%) compared with other widely adopted classification methods. Furthermore, we demonstrate the application of a Guided Grad-CAM visualization to generate heatmaps and identify the top-ranked tumor-type-specific genes and pathways. Experimental results on prostate and breast cancer demonstrate our method can be applied to various types of cancer. Powered by the deep learning, this approach can potentially provide a new solution for pan-cancer classification and cancer driver gene discovery. The source code and datasets supporting the study is available at https://github.com/yetaoyu/Genomic-pan-cancer-classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.