ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2020
[Prognosis of pregnancy among married child students in Niamey, Republic of Niger].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of unplanned first pregnancy and socioeconomic factors in Benin: a cross-sectional and analytical study.BMJ public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionthe purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and to evaluate maternal and perinatal prognosis during pregnancy and childbirth among married child students in the city of Niamey.
methodswe conducted a case-control study of gestants and parturients at the Issaka Gazobi Maternity Hospital in Niamey over the period January 2018-December 31, 2018. Child students (<18 years) were compared to students aged 18-27 years. Maternal sociodemographic parameters and maternal and perinatal mortality were analyzed. The usual statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze the results. The significance level was set at p <0.05.
resultsthe frequency of delivery among child students was 3.06%. Minors attended prenatal follow-up (46.7% vs 41.9%) more diligently than adults. Cesarean section (ORa=2 [1.0-3.0]) eclampsia (ORa=2 [1.0-4.4]), episiotomy (ORa=2[1.2-1.8]) and neonatal depression (p <0.05 (10.6% vs 5.8%)) were higher among minors than among adults. Perinatal mortality was high in both groups.
conclusionour results are close to those described in other European and African studies. The differences in obstetric and perinatal risks seem to be related to socio-demographic factors of child mothers. These should be taken into account in any approach to the prevention of pregnancy complications in minors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.