ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2020
Carotid artery stenting with Roadsaver stent. Early and four-year results from a single-center registry.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carotid Artery Stenting With Double-Layer Stent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2024Pooled it
- Incidence, Timing and Associated Factors of In-Stent Restenosis after CASPER Placement: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Management of complex symptomatic renal artery aneurysm in a patient with Sjögren's syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus.BMJ case reports · 2025Article
- [Stenting of the extracranial internal carotid artery].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Carotid artery interventions - endarterectomy versus stenting.AsiaIntervention · 2023Review
- Technical considerations of endovascular management of true visceral artery aneurysms.CVIR endovascular · 2023Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrevention of peri- and postprocedural complications is still a challenge in carotid artery stenting (CAS).
aimTo assess immediate and long-term safety and effectiveness of CAS using the Roadsaver double-nitinol-layer-micromesh stent. MATERIAL AND
methodsSince 2014, 298 CAS procedures in 287 non-consecutive patients (203 men, mean age 70.5 ±8.6 years, 100% symptomatic/high risk lesions) have been performed using the Roadsaver stent and proximal (40%) or distal (60%) neuroprotection system. Clinical and neurological examinations as well as duplex ultrasound were completed before CAS, before discharge, at 1, 6 and 12 months, then annually.
resultsAll CAS procedures were successful. Carotid stenosis was reduced from 84.9 ±9.9% to 11.0 ±9.4% (
conclusionsCarotid artery stenting using the Roadsaver stent for symptomatic patients and high risk lesions showed to be safe and effective, with a low complication rate and acceptable in-stent restenosis risk in 4-year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.