Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597844›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Roles of Non-coding RNAs in Central Nervous System Axon Regeneration.

Pei Li, Yuanyuan Jia, Wenbo Tang, Qingjun Cui, Ming Liu, Jingjing Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NcRNAs: a potential treatment for spinal cord injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  5. RNA in axons, dendrites, synapses and beyond.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of Non-coding RNAs in Axon Regeneration after Peripheral Nerve Injury.International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pei LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yuanyuan JiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Wenbo TangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qingjun CuiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Ming LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jingjing JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axons in the central nervous system often fail to regenerate after injury due to the limited intrinsic regeneration ability of the central nervous system (CNS) and complex extracellular inhibitory factors. Therefore, it is of vital importance to have a better understanding of potential methods to promote the regeneration capability of injured nerves. Evidence has shown that non-coding RNAs play an essential role in nerve regeneration, especially long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), microRNA (miRNA), and circular RNA (circRNA). In this review, we profile their separate roles in axon regeneration after CNS injuries, such as spinal cord injury (SCI) and optic nerve injury. In addition, we also reveal the interactive networks among non-coding RNAs.

Indexed as

central nervous systemnerve regenerationnon-coding RNAoptic nerve injuryspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID33597844
PMCPMC7882506
OpenAlexW3127595924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.