Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597833›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2021

A Community Resource Navigator Model: Utilizing Student Volunteers to Integrate Health and Social Care in a Community Health Center Setting.

Sahil Sandhu, Jacqueline Xu, Lillian Blanchard, Howard Eisenson, Carolyn Crowder, Veronica Sotelo Munoz, Connor Drake, Janet Prvu Bettger

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sahil SandhuTrinity College of Arts & Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-5253
Jacqueline XuTrinity College of Arts & Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Lillian BlanchardTrinity College of Arts & Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Howard EisensonLincoln Community Health Center, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0400-7528
Carolyn CrowderLincoln Community Health Center, NC, USA.
Veronica Sotelo MunozSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Connor DrakeDuke Center for Personalized Healthcare, School of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-6246
Janet Prvu BettgerDuke Center for Personalized Healthcare, School of Medicine, Duke University, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-8413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile unmet social needs are major drivers of health outcomes, most health systems are not fully integrated with the social care sector to address them. In this case study, we describe the development and implementation of a model utilizing student volunteer community resource navigators to help patients connect with community-based organizations (CBOs). We then detail initial implementation outcomes and practical considerations for future work.

methodsWe used the Ten Essential Public Health Services Framework to guide program planning of a student "Help Desk" model for a community health center. Planning included a literature review, observation of exemplar programs, development of a CBO directory, and evaluation of the center's patient population, clinical workflows, and data infrastructure. We piloted the model for two months. After pilot completion, we reviewed patient data to understand the feasibility of the student "Help Desk" model. We utilized planning and pilot execution materials, as well as pilot data, to develop and discuss practical considerations.

resultsDesign and implementation complemented ongoing social needs screening and referral to CBOs by center case managers. Patients were asked if they would accept telephone follow-up by volunteers two and four weeks after the clinic visit. Of 61 patients screened, 29 patients were referred for follow-up. Ninety percent were reached at least once during the follow-up period, and 48% of patients referred reported connecting to at least one CBO. Only 27% of patients required escalation back to case managers, and no emergency escalation was needed for any patients. Students, faculty advisors, and community health center frontline staff and leadership supported the scale up and continuation of the "Help Desk" model at the community health center. DISCUSSION: Successful implementation required multi-sectoral collaboration, well-defined scope of practice, and data interoperability. Student volunteers are untapped resources to support integrated health and social care.

Indexed as

integrated health and social careprimary caresocial determinants of healthstudentsvolunteer models

Identifiers

PMID33597833
PMCPMC7863845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.