Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597639›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Reconstructing phase-resolved hysteresis loops from first-order reversal curves.

Dustin A Gilbert, Peyton D Murray, Julius De Rojas, Randy K Dumas, Joseph E Davies, Kai Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Single-Phase L1Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  3. Magnetic Nanowires for Nanobarcoding and Beyond.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dustin A GilbertDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37919, USA. dagilbert@utk.edu.
Peyton D MurrayPhysics Department, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Julius De RojasPhysics Department, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Randy K DumasQuantum Design, Inc, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
Joseph E DaviesAdvanced Technology Group, NVE Corp, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA.
Kai LiuPhysics Department, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Funding

Department of Energy, United States DE-SC0021344National Science Foundation, United States ECCS-1933527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first order reversal curve (FORC) method is a magnetometry based technique used to capture nanoscale magnetic phase separation and interactions with macroscopic measurements using minor hysteresis loop analysis. This makes the FORC technique a powerful tool in the analysis of complex systems which cannot be effectively probed using localized techniques. However, recovering quantitative details about the identified phases which can be compared to traditionally measured metrics remains an enigmatic challenge. We demonstrate a technique to reconstruct phase-resolved magnetic hysteresis loops by selectively integrating the measured FORC distribution. From these minor loops, the traditional metrics-including the coercivity and saturation field, and the remanent and saturation magnetization-can be determined. In order to perform this analysis, special consideration must be paid to the accurate quantitative management of the so-called reversible features. This technique is demonstrated on three representative materials systems, high anisotropy FeCuPt thin-films, Fe nanodots, and SmCo/Fe exchange spring magnet films, and shows excellent agreement with the direct measured major loop, as well as the phase separated loops.

Identifiers

PMID33597639
PMCPMC7889904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.