Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597615›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Real-time acoustic sensing and artificial intelligence for error prevention in orthopedic surgery.

Matthias Seibold, Steven Maurer, Armando Hoch, Patrick Zingg, Mazda Farshad, Nassir Navab, Philipp Fürnstahl

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sound source localization for spatial mapping of surgical actions in dynamic scenes.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Cobotic drilling assistant for orthopedic surgery using Gaussian process-based breakthrough detection.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The sound of surgery-development of an acoustic trocar system enabling laparoscopic sound analysis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Using acoustic feedback and analyses for removal of bone cement during revision knee replacement surgeries.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias SeiboldComputer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany. matthias.seibold@tum.de.
Steven MaurerBalgrist University Hospital, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Armando HochBalgrist University Hospital, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Patrick ZinggBalgrist University Hospital, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mazda FarshadBalgrist University Hospital, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nassir NavabComputer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Philipp FürnstahlResearch in Orthopedic Computer Science (ROCS), University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Balgrist Campus, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Universitätsklinik Balgrist · CHTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we developed and validated a computer method capable of robustly detecting drill breakthrough events and show the potential of deep learning-based acoustic sensing for surgical error prevention. Bone drilling is an essential part of orthopedic surgery and has a high risk of injuring vital structures when over-drilling into adjacent soft tissue. We acquired a dataset consisting of structure-borne audio recordings of drill breakthrough sequences with custom piezo contact microphones in an experimental setup using six human cadaveric hip specimens. In the following step, we developed a deep learning-based method for the automated detection of drill breakthrough events in a fast and accurate fashion. We evaluated the proposed network regarding breakthrough detection sensitivity and latency. The best performing variant yields a sensitivity of [Formula: see text]% for drill breakthrough detection in a total execution time of 139.29[Formula: see text]. The validation and performance evaluation of our solution demonstrates promising results for surgical error prevention by automated acoustic-based drill breakthrough detection in a realistic experiment while being multiple times faster than a surgeon's reaction time. Furthermore, our proposed method represents an important step for the translation of acoustic-based breakthrough detection towards surgical use.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAnimalsBone and BonesCadaverHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, AcousticMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresModels, BiologicalOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsSurgery, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID33597615
PMCPMC7889943
OpenAlexW3133021457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.