Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597612›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2021

Feasibility and patency of echoendoscopic anastomoses with lumen apposing metal stents depending on the gastrointestinal segment involved.

Maite Betés, Pablo Pérez-Longo, Sandra Peralta, Alejandro Bojorquez, Ramon Angós, Ana Chopitea, Jorge Baixauli, Miguel Munoz-Navas, Jose Carlos Súbtil

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided duodenojejunostomy for a duodenal duplication cyst presenting with duodenal obstruction.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maite BetésDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain. mbetesi@unav.es.
Pablo Pérez-LongoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Sandra PeraltaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Alejandro BojorquezDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Ramon AngósDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana ChopiteaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Jorge BaixauliDepartment of General Surgery, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Miguel Munoz-NavasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Jose Carlos SúbtilDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
Universidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EUS-guided anastomoses with LAMS have emerged as a therapeutic option for patients with obstruction of the digestive tract. However, the long-term permeability of these anastomoses remains unknown. Most of the published cases involve the gastric wall and experience in distal obstruction is limited to few case reports. We review our series of patients treated with LAMS for gastrointestinal obstruction and describe the technical success according to the anastomotic site and the long-term follow-up in those cases in which the stent migrated spontaneously or was removed. Out of 30 cases treated with LAMS, EUS-guided anastomosis did not involve the gastric wall in 6 patients. These procedures were technically more challenging as two failures were recorded (2/6, 33%) while technical success was achieved in 100% of the cases in which the stent was placed through the gastric wall. In two of the patients, one with entero-enteric and another with recto-colic anastomosis, stent removal after spontaneous displacement was followed by long term permeability of the EUS-guided anastomosis (172 and 234 days respectively). In a EUS-guided gastroenterostomy the stent was removed at 118 days, but closure of the fistula was confirmed 26 days later. Our experience suggests that LAMS placement between bowel loops is feasible and might allow the creation of an anastomosis with long-term patency. As compared to LAMS placement between bowel loops, when LAMS are placed through the gastric wall, removal of the LAMS seems to lead to closure of the fistula.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEndosonographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastroenterostomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStentsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33597612
PMCPMC7889646
OpenAlexW3133396006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.