Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597516›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Frontotemporal coordination predicts working memory performance and its local neural signatures.

Ehsan Rezayat, Mohammad-Reza A Dehaqani, Kelsey Clark, Zahra Bahmani, Tirin Moore, Behrad Noudoost

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Timescales of learning in prefrontal cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Beta Oscillations in Monkey Striatum Encode Reward Prediction Error Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ehsan RezayatSchool of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-1283
Mohammad-Reza A DehaqaniSchool of Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran. dehaqani@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-4365
Kelsey ClarkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Zahra BahmaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Tirin MooreDepartment of Neurobiology Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-2930
Behrad NoudoostDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. behrad.noudoost@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1588-027X

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PAUL STEVEN BERNSTEIN · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR01EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2004 to 2024
$7.3M
Understanding the prefrontal mechanisms involved in the enhancement and maintenance of visual signals.R01EY026924 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
Sensory recruitment by working memory: neuronal basis and neural circuitryR01NS113073 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR56EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2009 to 2009
$398k
Understanding the neural basis for recruitment of visual areas by working memoryR01MH121435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOUDOOST, BEHRAD · 2020 to 2020
$191k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014924NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026924NEI NIH HHS R56 EY014924NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121435NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in some sensory areas reflect the content of working memory (WM) in their spiking activity. However, this spiking activity is seldom related to behavioral performance. We studied the responses of inferotemporal (IT) neurons, which exhibit object-selective activity, along with Frontal Eye Field (FEF) neurons, which exhibit spatially selective activity, during the delay period of an object WM task. Unlike the spiking activity and local field potentials (LFPs) within these areas, which were poor predictors of behavioral performance, the phase-locking of IT spikes and LFPs with the beta band of FEF LFPs robustly predicted successful WM maintenance. In addition, IT neurons exhibited greater object-selective persistent activity when their spikes were locked to the phase of FEF LFPs. These results reveal that the coordination between prefrontal and temporal cortex predicts the successful maintenance of visual information during WM.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsFrontal LobeMacaca mulattaMaleMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalNeuronsPhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexTemporal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID33597516
PMCPMC7889930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.