Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597515›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Reentrant liquid condensate phase of proteins is stabilized by hydrophobic and non-ionic interactions.

Georg Krainer, Timothy J Welsh, Jerelle A Joseph, Jorge R Espinosa, Sina Wittmann, Ella de Csilléry, Akshay Sridhar, Zenon Toprakcioglu, Giedre Gudiškytė, Magdalena A Czekalska and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 281 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
281citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

281 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Physics-guided design of intrinsically disordered proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

221 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Georg Krainer *Centre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-7636
Timothy J Welsh *Centre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7817-5722
Jerelle A Joseph *Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4525-180X
Jorge R EspinosaCavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, UK.
Sina WittmannMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (MPI-CBG), Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0074-5331
Ella de CsilléryCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5917-9349
Akshay SridharCavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, UK.
Zenon ToprakciogluCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Giedre GudiškytėCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Magdalena A CzekalskaCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4494-4463
William E ArterCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3615-1885
Jordina Guillén-BoixetBiotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Technische Universität Dresden, Tatzberg 47/49, Dresden, Germany.
Titus M FranzmannBiotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Technische Universität Dresden, Tatzberg 47/49, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4281-7209
Seema QamarCambridge Institute for Medical Research, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter St George-HyslopCambridge Institute for Medical Research, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. phs22@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-7209
Anthony A HymanMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (MPI-CBG), Dresden, Germany. hyman@mpi-cbg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0851-704X
Rosana Collepardo-GuevaraCavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, UK. rc597@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1781-7351
Simon AlbertiBiotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Technische Universität Dresden, Tatzberg 47/49, Dresden, Germany. simon.alberti@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4017-6505
Tuomas P J KnowlesCentre for Misfolding Diseases, Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. tpjk2@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-0140

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCIHRWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203249/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid-liquid phase separation of proteins underpins the formation of membraneless compartments in living cells. Elucidating the molecular driving forces underlying protein phase transitions is therefore a key objective for understanding biological function and malfunction. Here we show that cellular proteins, which form condensates at low salt concentrations, including FUS, TDP-43, Brd4, Sox2, and Annexin A11, can reenter a phase-separated regime at high salt concentrations. By bringing together experiments and simulations, we demonstrate that this reentrant phase transition in the high-salt regime is driven by hydrophobic and non-ionic interactions, and is mechanistically distinct from the low-salt regime, where condensates are additionally stabilized by electrostatic forces. Our work thus sheds light on the cooperation of hydrophobic and non-ionic interactions as general driving forces in the condensation process, with important implications for aberrant function, druggability, and material properties of biomolecular condensates.

Indexed as

Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhase TransitionStatic ElectricityAnimalsAnnexinsBromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansProteinsRNA-Binding Protein FUSSf9 CellsSOXB1 Transcription FactorsSpodopteraTranscription FactorsAnnexinsBRD4 protein, humanBromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsProteinsRNA-Binding Protein FUSSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTARDBP protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID33597515
PMCPMC7889641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.