Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597272›Full record

ArticleCancer research2021

Inhibition of ATM Induces Hypersensitivity to Proton Irradiation by Upregulating Toxic End Joining.

Qin Zhou, Michelle E Howard, Xinyi Tu, Qian Zhu, Janet M Denbeigh, Nicholas B Remmes, Michael G Herman, Chris J Beltran, Jian Yuan, Patricia T Greipp and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NRG Oncology White Paper on the Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Syk-dependent homologous recombination activation promotes cancer resistance to DNA targeted therapy.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Key molecular DNA damage responses of human cells to radiation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qin Zhou *Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Michelle E Howard *Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9870-9218
Xinyi TuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Qian ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Janet M DenbeighDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nicholas B RemmesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Michael G HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Chris J BeltranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jian YuanDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Patricia T GreippDivision of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Judy C BougheyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3820-3228
Liewei WangDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Neil JohnsonMolecular Therapeutics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew P GoetzDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Zhenkun LouDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. mutter.robert@mayo.edu lou.zhenkun@mayo.edu.
Robert W MutterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. mutter.robert@mayo.edu lou.zhenkun@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USFox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Fergus Joseph Couch · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Mayo Clinic Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research ProgramK12HD065987 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KANTARCI, KEJAL · 2010 to 2023
$6.7M
Compensatory Mechanisms that Promote Homologous Recombination in BRCA1 Mutant CancersR01CA214799 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Neil Johnson · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
Regulation of homologous recombination and cancer cell response to chemoradiotherapyR01CA203561 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LOU, ZHENKUN · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Deubiquitinases in regulation of BRCA1 pathwayR01CA203971 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KAUFMANN, SCOTT H, LOU, ZHENKUN · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203561NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203971NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214799NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton Bragg peak irradiation has a higher ionizing density than conventional photon irradiation or the entrance of the proton beam profile. Whether targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) could enhance vulnerability to the distinct pattern of damage induced by proton Bragg peak irradiation is currently unknown. Here, we performed genetic or pharmacologic manipulation of key DDR elements and evaluated DNA damage signaling, DNA repair, and tumor control in cell lines and xenografts treated with the same physical dose across a radiotherapy linear energy transfer spectrum. Radiotherapy consisted of 6 MV photons and the entrance beam or Bragg peak of a 76.8 MeV spot scanning proton beam. More complex DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) induced by Bragg peak proton irradiation preferentially underwent resection and engaged homologous recombination (HR) machinery. Unexpectedly, the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor, AZD0156, but not an inhibitor of ATM and Rad3-related, rendered cells hypersensitive to more densely ionizing proton Bragg peak irradiation. ATM inhibition blocked resection and shunted more DSBs to processing by toxic ligation through nonhomologous end-joining, whereas loss of DNA ligation via XRCC4 or Lig4 knockdown rescued resection and abolished the enhanced Bragg peak cell killing. Proton Bragg peak monotherapy selectively sensitized cell lines and tumor xenografts with inherent HR defects, and the repair defect induced by ATM inhibitor coadministration showed enhanced efficacy in HR-proficient models. In summary, inherent defects in HR or administration of an ATM inhibitor in HR-proficient tumors selectively enhances the relative biological effectiveness of proton Bragg peak irradiation. SIGNIFICANCE: Coadministration of an ATM inhibitor rewires DNA repair machinery to render cancer cells uniquely hypersensitive to DNA damage induced by the proton Bragg peak, which is characterized by higher density ionization.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairRadiation ToleranceAnimalsApoptosisAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBreast NeoplasmsCell MovementCell ProliferationFemaleHumansMiceMice, NudeProton TherapySignal TransductionTumor Cells, CulturedAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33597272
PMCPMC8260463
OpenAlexW3130226337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.