Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597168›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2024

Virtual reality in specialist palliative care: a feasibility study to enable clinical practice adoption.

Amara Callistus Nwosu, Mark Mills, Simon Roughneen, Sarah Stanley, Laura Chapman, Stephen R Mason

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Virtual Reality in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amara Callistus NwosuInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK a.nwosu@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-3741
Mark MillsMarie Curie Hospice Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Simon RoughneenAcademic Palliative and End of Life Care Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Sarah StanleyMarie Curie Hospice Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Laura ChapmanMarie Curie Hospice Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen R MasonPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Marie Curie Hospice · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBNational Observatory · BR

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of virtual reality (VR) is increasing in palliative care. However, despite increasing interest in VR, there is little evidence of how this technology can be implemented into practice.

aimsThis paper aims to: (1) explore the feasibility of implementing VR therapy, for patients and caregivers, in a hospital specialist inpatient palliative care unit and a hospice, and (2) to identify questions for organisations, to support VR adoption in palliative care.

methodsThe Samsung Gear VR system was used in a hospital specialist palliative inpatient unit and a hospice. Patients and caregivers received VR distraction therapy and provided feedback of their experience. Staff completed a feedback questionnaire to explore their opinion of the usefulness of VR in palliative care. A public engagement event was conducted, to identify questions to support implementation of VR in palliative care settings.

resultsFifteen individuals (12 (80%) patients and 3 (20%) caregivers) participated. All had a positive experience. No adverse effects were reported. Ten items were identified for organisations to consider ahead of adoption of VR in palliative care. These were questions about: the purpose of VR; intended population; supporting evidence; session duration; equipment choice; infection control issues; content choice; setting of VR; person(s) responsible for delivery and the maintenance plan.

conclusionsIt is feasible to use VR therapy in palliative care; however, further evidence about its efficacy and effectiveness is needed. Palliative care practitioners considering VR use should carefully consider several factors, to ensure that this technology can be used safely and effectively in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingVirtual RealityCaregiversFeasibility StudiesHumansPalliative Carequality of lifesupportive caresymptoms and symptom managementterminal care

Identifiers

PMID33597168
PMCPMC10894832
OpenAlexW3128511280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.