ArticleBMJ open2021
Identifying the competencies of China's paediatric residents: a modified Delphi method study.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Development of the Tool for Rating the qUality of Services sTandards (TRUST).Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2026Article
- An index system for evaluating the data security in trauma centers: a modified Delphi study in China.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2026Article
- Construction of a public health emergency information system framework: A case study of Zhuhai city, China.PloS one · 2026Article
- Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the hemodialysis patient care dependency scale (HD-CDS).PloS one · 2026Article
- Building the 8-star doctor: a modified Delphi study to define, teach, and assess health professions education for undergraduate medical students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Developing an Evaluation Index System for Service Capability of Internet Hospitals in China: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Study on the construction of a Chinese cardiovascular physician competency model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Carbon emissions accounting and uncertainty analysis in campus settings: A case study of a university in Sichuan, China.PloS one · 2025Article
- The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study.Global health research and policy · 2024Article
- Development of the assessment standards of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Geriatric Core Set through a modified Delphi method.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Establishment of infection prevention and control strategy in nursing managements during surgical operations in COVID-19 patients based on Delphi method.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-management behaviours scale in rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA-SMBS).BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Conditions required to ensure successful detection and management of mild cognitive impairment in primary care: A Delphi consultation study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStandardised Training of Paediatric Resident (STPR) plays an essential role in training qualified paediatricians. Until now, China had no paediatric resident competency index system to effectively guide and evaluate the competence of paediatric residents. This study aimed to establish a competency index system for paediatric residents in China to provide a reference for improving the training system and quality of STPR. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingThis study conducted two rounds of Delphi expert consultation survey among paediatric medical experts (n=16), followed by screening, revising and supplementing indicators using the boundary value method. Next, the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weight of indicators and finally establish a competency index system for paediatric residents.
resultsThe results of the statistical analysis revealed a positive coefficient of 100% for both rounds of expert consultation. The expert authority coefficient values were 0.82 and 0.83, and the expert coordination coefficient test was p<0.01. After referring to experts' opinions, a competency index system for paediatric residents with 5 primary indicators, 14 secondary indicators and 73 tertiary indicators was finally formed and the weight of each indicator was calculated. The five primary indicators were professional quality (0.3187), knowledge and skills (0.2734), communication and cooperation (0.1986), lifelong learning (0.1302), and teaching ability (0.0791).
conclusionsIn this study, a competency index system for paediatric residents was constructed following the characteristics and quality requirements for paediatric residents in China and is expected to significantly improve the overall level of paediatricians' medical service quality and supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.