Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597092›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2021

Socioeconomic inequality and omission of adjuvant radiation therapy in high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.

Leo Y Luo, Emeline M Aviki, Anna Lee, Marisa A Kollmeier, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, C Jillian Tsai, Kaled M Alektiar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Disparities in Gynecologic Cancers.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leo Y LuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York 10065, United States of America.
Emeline M AvikiGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York 10065, United States of America.
Anna LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York 10065, United States of America.
Marisa A KollmeierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York 10065, United States of America.
Nadeem R Abu-RustumGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York 10065, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, New York 10065, United States of America.
C Jillian TsaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York 10065, United States of America.
Kaled M AlektiarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, New York 10065, United States of America. Electronic address: alektiak@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Fellow and Resident Radiation Oncology iNtensive Training in Imaging and Informatics to Empower Research Careers (FRONTI2ER)R25EB025787 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DAS, PRAJNAN, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$535k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R25 EB025787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGaps in access to appropriate cancer care, and associated cancer mortality, have widened across socioeconomic groups. We examined whether demographic and socioeconomic factors influenced receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in patients with high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.

methodsA retrospective study cohort was selected from 349,404 endometrial carcinoma patients from the National Cancer Database in whom adjuvant RT would be recommended per national guidelines. The study included surgically treated patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer with one of the following criteria: 1) FIGO 2009 stage IB, grade 1/2 disease, age ≥ 60 years; 2) stage IB, grade 3 disease; or 3) stage II disease. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with omission of adjuvant RT. Association between adjuvant RT, covariables, and overall survival (OS) was assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

results19,594 patients were eligible for analysis; 47% did not receive adjuvant RT. Omission of adjuvant RT was more prevalent among African-American, Hispanic, and Asian compared to non-Hispanic white patients (OR 0.79, 95%CI: 0.69-0.91; OR 0.75, 95%CI: 0.64-0.87; OR 0.75, 95%CI: 0.60-0.94, respectively). Lower median household income of patient's area of residence, lack of health insurance, treatment at non-academic hospitals, farther distance to treatment facilities, and residence in metropolitan counties were associated with omission of adjuvant RT. Such omission was independently associated with worse OS (HR1.43, p < 0.001).

conclusionAdjuvant RT is omitted in 47% of patients with early-stage, high-risk endometrial cancer, which is associated with poor access to appropriate, high-quality care and worse outcome.

Indexed as

AgedBlack or African AmericanCohort StudiesEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsAdjuvant radiation therapyEndometrial cancerOutcomesQuality careSocioeconomic inequality

Identifiers

PMID33597092
PMCPMC8084986
OpenAlexW3131597662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.