Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597064›Full record

SynthesisEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2021

EPA guidance on assessment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

S Galderisi, A Mucci, S Dollfus, M Nordentoft, P Falkai, S Kaiser, G M Giordano, A Vandevelde, M Ø Nielsen, L B Glenthøj and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 142 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06127004 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Metacognitive Training for Negative Symptoms (MCT Minus)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSormland County Council, SwedenRan2024 to 2032Enrolled90ConditionsNegative Symptoms in SchizophreniaArmsMetacognitive Training for Negative Symptoms (MCT), Supportive Counselling
NCT07759895 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Combination Therapy of Deferiprone and N-Acetylcysteine for Treating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmit LotanRan2026 to 2029Enrolled80ConditionsSchizoaffecitve Disorder, Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia and Predominant Negative SymptomsArmsDeferiprone (DFP), N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Serotonin type 3 receptor (5-HTNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

S GalderisiDepartment of Psychiatry, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1592-7656
A MucciDepartment of Psychiatry, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6195-9456
S DollfusCHU de Caen, Service de Psychiatrie, 14000Caen, France.
M NordentoftCopenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
P FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
S KaiserDivision of Adult Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3013-2034
G M GiordanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
A VandeveldeCHU de Caen, Service de Psychiatrie, 14000Caen, France.
M Ø NielsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
L B GlenthøjCopenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-8450
M SabéDivision of Adult Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8530-5596
P PezzellaDepartment of Psychiatry, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
I BitterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
W GaebelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the last decades, a renewed interest for negative symptoms (NS) was brought about by the increased awareness that they interfere severely with real-life functioning, particularly when they are primary and persistent.

methodsIn this guidance paper, we provide a systematic review of the evidence and elaborate several recommendations for the conceptualization and assessment of NS in clinical trials and practice.

resultsExpert consensus and systematic reviews have provided guidance for the optimal assessment of primary and persistent negative symptoms; second-generation rating scales, which provide a better assessment of the experiential domains, are available; however, NS are still poorly assessed both in research and clinical settings.This European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance recommends the use of persistent negative symptoms (PNS) construct in the context of clinical trials and highlights the need for further efforts to make the definition of PNS consistent across studies in order to exclude as much as possible secondary negative symptoms. We also encourage clinicians to use second-generation scales, at least to complement first-generation ones.The EPA guidance further recommends the evidence-based exclusion of several items included in first-generation scales from any NS summary or factor score to improve NS measurement in research and clinical settings. Self-rated instruments are suggested to further complement observer-rated scales in NS assessment.Several recommendations are provided for the identification of secondary negative symptoms in clinical settings.

conclusionsThe dissemination of this guidance paper may promote the development of national guidelines on negative symptom assessment and ultimately improve the care of people with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSchizophrenic PsychologySymptom AssessmentAssessment instrumentsconceptualizationpersistent negative symptomsprimary negative symptomssecondary negative symptoms

Identifiers

PMID33597064
PMCPMC8080207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.