Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597029›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2021

Vaginal colonization with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria among women in labor in central Uganda: prevalence and associated factors.

Josephine Tumuhamye, Hans Steinsland, Freddie Bwanga, James K Tumwine, Grace Ndeezi, David Mukunya, Olive Namugga, Agnes Napyo Kasede, Halvor Sommerfelt, Victoria Nankabirwa

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Umbilical Cord Stump Infections in Central Uganda: Incidence, Bacteriological Profile, and Risk Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Josephine TumuhamyeCentre for Intervention Science for Maternal and Child Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. tphynne@gmail.com.
Hans SteinslandCentre for Intervention Science for Maternal and Child Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Freddie BwangaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
James K TumwineDepartment of Paediatric and Child Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Grace NdeeziDepartment of Paediatric and Child Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
David MukunyaCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Olive NamuggaCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Agnes Napyo KasedeCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Halvor SommerfeltCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Victoria NankabirwaCentre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOMakerere University · UGBusitema University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to WHO ( CISMAC. Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child health), the antimicrobial resistant bacteria considered to be clinically most important for human health and earmarked for surveillance include extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant bacteria, methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B -resistant vancomycin-resistant (VRSA) Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). If these bacteria are carried in the female genital tract, they may be transmitted to the neonate causing local or systemic neonatal infections that can be difficult to treat with conventionally available antimicrobials. In order to develop effective treatment strategies, there is need for updated information about the prevalence of colonization with important antimicrobial-resistant pathogens.

objectiveWe sought to estimate the prevalence of vaginal colonization with potentially pathogenic and clinically important AMR bacteria among women in labour in Uganda and to identify factors associated with colonization.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among HIV-1 and HIV-2 negative women in labour at three primary health care facilities in Uganda. Drug susceptibility testing was done using the disk diffusion method on bacterial isolates cultured from vaginal swabs. We calculated the prevalence of colonization with potentially pathogenic and clinically important AMR bacteria, in addition to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, defined as bacteria resistant to antibiotics from ≥ 3 antibiotic classes.

resultsWe found that 57 of the 1472 enrolled women (3.9% prevalence; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 3.0%, 5.1%) were colonized with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceace, 27 (1.8%; 95% CI 1.2%, 2.6%) were colonized with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and 85 (5.8%; 95% CI 4.6%, 7.1%) were colonized with MRSA. The prevalence of colonization with MDR bacteria was high (750/1472; 50.9%; 95% CI 48.4%, 53.5%). Women who were ≥ 30 years of age had higher odds of being colonized with MDR bacteria compared to women aged 20-24 years (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1, 2.2).

conclusionMost of the women included in our study were vaginally colonized with potentially pathogenic MDR and other clinically important AMR bacteria. The high prevalence of colonization with these bacteria is likely to further increase the incidence of difficult-to-treat neonatal sepsis.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAdultCarrier StateCross-Sectional StudiesEnterobacteriaceaeFemaleHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPregnancyPrevalenceUgandaVaginaYoung AdultAntimicrobial resistanceCarbapenem-resistant bacteriaESBLMDRMLSBMRSAMultidrug resistanceVaginal colonization

Identifiers

PMID33597029
PMCPMC7887551
OpenAlexW3133199837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.