Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33597028›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2021

The dysbiosis of ovine foot microbiome during the development and treatment of contagious ovine digital dermatitis.

J S Duncan, J W Angell, P Richards, L Lenzi, G J Staton, D Grove-White, S Clegg, G Oikonomou, S D Carter, N J Evans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lesion Material FromFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J S DuncanDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK. jsduncan@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1370-3085
J W AngellWern Veterinary Surgeons, Department of Research and Innovation, Unit 11, Lon Parcwr Industrial Estate, Ruthin, LL15 1NJ, UK.
P RichardsDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK.
L LenziCentre for Genomic Research, Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK.
G J StatonDepartment of Infection Biology & Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, The University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK.
D Grove-WhiteDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK.
S CleggSchool of Life Sciences, College of Science, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool Campus, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK.
G OikonomouDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK.
S D CarterDepartment of Infection Biology & Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, The University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK.
N J EvansDepartment of Infection Biology & Microbiomes, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Science, The University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston, Wirral, CH64 7TE, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N002121/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContagious Ovine Digital Dermatitis (CODD) is an emerging and common infectious foot disease of sheep which causes severe welfare and economic problems for the sheep industry. The aetiology of the disease is not fully understood and control of the disease is problematic. The aim of this study was to investigate the polybacterial aetiopathogenesis of CODD and the effects of antibiotic treatment, in a longitudinal study of an experimentally induced disease outbreak using a 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing approach.

resultsCODD was induced in 15/30 experimental sheep. During the development of CODD three distinct phenotypic lesion stages were observed. These were an initial interdigital dermatitis (ID) lesion, followed by a footrot (FR) lesion, then finally a CODD lesion. Distinct microbiota were observed for each lesion in terms of microbial diversity, clustering and composition. Porphyromonadaceae, Family XI, Veillonellaceae and Fusobacteriaceae were significantly associated with the diseased feet. Veillonellaceae and Fusobacteriaceae were most associated with the earlier stages of ID and footrot rather than CODD. Following antibiotic treatment of the sheep, the foot microbiota showed a strong tendency to return to the composition of the healthy state. The microbiota composition of CODD lesions collected by swab and biopsy methods were different. In particular, the Spirochaetaceae family were more abundant in samples collected by the biopsy method, suggesting that these bacteria are present in deeper tissues of the diseased foot.

conclusionIn this study, CODD presented as part of a spectrum of poly-bacterial foot disease strongly associated with bacterial families Porphyromonadaceae, Family XI (a family in Clostridiales also known as Clostridium cluster XI), Veillonellaceae and Fusobacteriaceae which are predominately Gram-negative anaerobes. Following antibiotic treatment, the microbiome showed a strong tendency to return to the composition of the healthy state. The composition of the healthy foot microbiome does not influence susceptibility to CODD. Based on the data presented here and that CODD appears to be the severest end stage of sheep infectious foot disease lesions, better control of the initial ID and FR lesions would enable better control of CODD and enable better animal welfare.

Indexed as

CODDFootrotLamenessMicrobiomeSheep

Identifiers

PMID33597028
PMCPMC7888161
OpenAlexW3119561171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.