Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596970›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Nasal nalbuphine analgesia in prehospital trauma managed by first-responder personnel on ski slopes in Switzerland: an observational cohort study.

Urs Pietsch, Yoël Berger, David Schurter, Lorenz Theiler, Volker Wenzel, Lorenz Meuli, Andreas Grünenfelder, Roland Albrecht

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate analgesia in prehospital trauma care: an observational cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023
    Observational
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Urs PietschDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland. urs.pietsch@kssg.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6957-2638
Yoël BergerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
David SchurterSchutz & Rettung Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Lorenz TheilerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Volker WenzelDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrichshafen Regional Hospital, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
Lorenz MeuliDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Andreas GrünenfelderDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Klinik Gut, St. Moritz, Switzerland.
Roland AlbrechtDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHKantonsspital Aarau · CHSulzer (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is one of the major symptoms complained about by patients in the prehospital setting, especially in the case of trauma. When there is mountainous topography, as in Switzerland, there may be a time delay between injury and arrival of professional rescuers, in particular on ski slopes. Administration of a safe opioid by first responders may improve overall treatment. We therefore assessed administration of nasal nalbuphine as an analgesic treatment for trauma patients in Switzerland.

methodsThis observational cohort study examined 267 patients who were treated with nasal nalbuphine by first responders in six ski resorts in Switzerland. All first responders were instructed to begin treatment by assessing the feasibility of using nalbuphine to treat pain in the patient. A treatment algorithm was developed and distributed to assure that nalbuphine was only administered following a strict protocol. Data regarding pain scores and pain reduction after administration of nalbuphine were collected on-site. Refills were handed out to the first responders with the return of each completed questionnaire.

resultsNalbuphine provided effective pain relief, with the median level of pain on the numeric rating scale for pain reduced by 3 units on average, from 8 points (p < 0.001). The multivariate regression model showed that pain reduction was more pronounced in patients with higher initial pain levels. Nalbuphine was more effective in adolsecents than in patients aged 20 to 60 years (p = 0.006). No major side effects were observed.

conclusionNasal administration of nalbuphine by first responders is a presumably safe and effective noninvasive pain management strategy for acutely injured patients in the prehospital setting. This may be an alternative, especially in the case of severe pain and prolonged time between arrival of the first responders and arrival of EMS/HEMS personnel on scene.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency RespondersAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNalbuphinePainProspective StudiesSkiingSwitzerlandWounds and InjuriesAnalgesics, OpioidNalbuphineEmergency medicineNalbuphinePainPrehospital analgesiaTraumaWilderness medicine

Identifiers

PMID33596970
PMCPMC7890875
OpenAlexW3131293402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.