Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596959›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Utility of Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) Trial: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial.

J Weindelmayer, V Mengardo, A Veltri, G L Baiocchi, S Giacopuzzi, G Verlato, G de Manzoni, Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG)

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04227951 (A Randomised Multicentre Controlled Trial of Gastrectomy With or Without Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage. The Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04227951 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Multicentre Controlled Trial of Gastrectomy With or Without Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage. The Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy Trial (ADiGe Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2019 to 2023Enrolled404ConditionsGastric CancerArmsAvoid drain placement, Drain placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Sensitive MRD Detection from Lymphatic Fluid after Surgery in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J WeindelmayerGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, Borgo Trento, 37126, Verona, Italy.
V MengardoGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, Borgo Trento, 37126, Verona, Italy. valentina.mengardo@gmail.com.
A VeltriGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, Borgo Trento, 37126, Verona, Italy.
G L BaiocchiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
S GiacopuzziGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, Borgo Trento, 37126, Verona, Italy.
G VerlatoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
G de ManzoniGeneral and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, Borgo Trento, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG)
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProphylactic use of abdominal drain in gastrectomy has been questioned in the last 15 years, and a 2015 Cochrane meta-analysis on four RCTs concluded that there was no convincing evidence to the routine drain placement in gastrectomy. Nevertheless, the authors evidenced the moderate/low quality of the included studies and highlighted how 3 out of 4 came from Eastern countries. After 2015, only retrospective studies have been published, all with inconsistent results.

methodsADiGe (Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy) Trial is a multicenter prospective randomized non-inferiority trial with a parallel design. It aimed to verify whether avoiding routine use of abdominal drain is burdened with complications, particularly an increase in postoperative invasive procedures. Patients with gastric cancer, scheduled for subtotal or total gastrectomy with curative intent, are eligible for inclusion, irrespective of previous oncological treatment. The primary composite endpoint is reoperation or percutaneous drainage procedures within 30 postoperative days. The primary analysis will verify whether the incidence of the primary composite endpoint is higher in the experimental arm, avoiding routine drain placement, than control arm, undergoing prophylactic drain placement, in order to falsify or support the null hypothesis of inferiority. Secondary endpoints assessed for superiority are overall morbidity and mortality, Comprehensive Complications Index, incidence and time for diagnosis of anastomotic and duodenal leaks, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. Assuming one-sided alpha of 5%, and cumulative incidence of the primary composite endpoint of 6.4% in the control arm and 4.2% in the experimental one, 364 patients allow to achieve 80% power to detect a non-inferiority margin difference between the arm proportions of 3.6%. Considering a 10% drop-out rate, 404 patients are needed. In order to have a balanced percentage between total and subtotal gastrectomy, recruitment will end at 202 patients for each type of gastrectomy. The surgeon and the patient are blinded until the end of the operation, while postoperative course is not blinded to the patient and caregivers. DISCUSSION: ADiGe Trial could contribute to critically re-evaluate the role of prophylactic drain in gastrectomy, a still widely used procedure.

trial registrationProspectively registered (last updated on 29 October 2020) at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT04227951 .

Indexed as

GastrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsDrainageEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesAbdominal drainDrainageGastrectomyGastric cancerRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33596959
PMCPMC7891135
OpenAlexW3118240533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.