ArticleCancer cell international2021
A novel clinical model for predicting malignancy of solitary pulmonary nodules: a multicenter study in chinese population.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Knowledge mapping analysis of ground glass nodules: a bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2023.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Integrating Clinical Features, Laboratory Biomarkers and Computed Tomography for the Discrimination of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Benign Pulmonary Diseases: A Clinical Prediction Model.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- Predictive model of malignancy probability in pulmonary nodules based on multicenter data.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Advances in modelling the risk of benign and malignant lung nodules.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- LASSO-Cox model in the prognostic evaluation of radiochemotherapy efficacy for lymph node metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- [Advances and Clinical Application of Malignant Probability Prediction Models for Solitary Pulmonary Nodule].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021Review
- Development and validation of a risk prediction score for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to establish and validate a novel clinical model to differentiate between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs).
methodsRecords from 295 patients with SPNs in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. The novel prediction model was established using LASSO logistic regression analysis by integrating clinical features, radiologic characteristics and laboratory test data, the calibration of model was analyzed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (HL test). Subsequently, the model was compared with PKUPH, Shanghai and Mayo models using receiver-operating characteristics curve (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI) with the same data. Other 101 SPNs patients in Henan Tumor Hospital were used for external validation cohort.
resultsA total of 11 variables were screened out and then aggregated to generate new prediction model. The model showed good calibration with the HL test (P = 0.964). The AUC for our model was 0.768, which was higher than other three reported models. DCA also showed our model was superior to the other three reported models. In our model, sensitivity = 78.84%, specificity = 61.32%. Compared with the PKUPH, Shanghai and Mayo models, the NRI of our model increased by 0.177, 0.127, and 0.396 respectively, and the IDI changed - 0.019, -0.076, and 0.112, respectively. Furthermore, the model was significant positive correlation with PKUPH, Shanghai and Mayo models.
conclusionsThe novel model in our study had a high clinical value in diagnose of MSPNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.