Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596888›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Surgical outcomes of two kinds of demineralized bone matrix putties/local autograft composites in instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Dong-Gune Chang, Jong-Beom Park, Yangjun Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Preparation and bone repair capability of a new plastic bone filler material].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Use of biphasic calcium phosphate versus demineralized bone matrix: retrospective clinical and CT analysis of posterolateral fusion results.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dong-Gune ChangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong-Beom ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. spinepjb@catholic.ac.kr.
Yangjun HanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of two kinds of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) putties/local autograft composites in instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).

methodsTwenty-seven fusion segments of 19 patients, who underwent decompression and instrumented PLF for lumbar spinal stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis less than grade 1, were included in this study. The PLF mass consisted of different two kinds of DBMs (Grafton® and DBX®) and local autograft. Next, 7.5 cc of Grafton® DBM/local autograft composite was implanted on the left side, and the same amount of DBX® DBM/local autograft composite was implanted on the right side in the same patient. The PLF masses of 54 total sides (27 Grafton® sides and 27 DBX® sides) were assessed for fusion based on both flexion/extension lateral radiographs and computed tomography images at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Clinical symptoms were also evaluated.

resultsAt 12 months postoperatively, the fusion rates for the Grafton® and DBX® sides were 59.5 and 51.9%, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.425). At 24 months postoperatively, the fusion rates for the Grafton® and DBX® sides increased to 70.4 and 66.7%, respectively, but the difference was still not statistically significant (P = 0.574). Diabetes mellitus, smoking, and obesity (body mass index ≥25) negatively affected the fusion rate of both the Grafton® and DBX® sides. Visual analog scores for lower back pain and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly improved after surgery (both, P < 0.01). No deep or superficial infections occurred postoperatively. No patients underwent revision surgery due to nonunion during follow-up.

conclusionsOur results suggest that two kinds of DBMs/local autograft composites might be considered as useful bone graft substitute in instrumented posterolateral fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis less than grade 1.

Indexed as

Bone MatrixSpinal FusionAutograftsBone TransplantationHumansLumbar VertebraeTreatment OutcomeBone graft substituteCompositeDemineralized bone matrixInstrumented posterolateral fusionLocal autograft

Identifiers

PMID33596888
PMCPMC7890888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.