Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596859›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Physical activity, return to work self-efficacy, and work status among employees undergoing chemotherapy for cancer - a prospective study with 12 months follow-up.

Rikke Rosbjerg, Robert Zachariae, Dorte Gilså Hansen, Inger Hoejris, Saskia Duijts, Nina Lykkegaard Gehr, Irene Dyhrberg Andersen, Merete Labriola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. The relationship between returning to work self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression in renal cancer patients: a cross-lagged analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Influencing factors analysis of adaptability of cancer patients to return-to-work.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rikke RosbjergDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Rikke.Rosbjerg@stab.rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-6853
Robert ZachariaeUnit for Psychooncology and Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dorte Gilså HansenResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Inger HoejrisDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Saskia DuijtsAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nina Lykkegaard GehrDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Irene Dyhrberg AndersenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Merete LabriolaNORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bergen, Norway.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Kræftens Bekæmpelse R137-A8880-15-S3Oticon Fonden 16-1960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous studies emphasize the positive effects of physical activity on health and well-being in cancer patients. The effects of physical activity on the working lives of cancer patients have received less attention. The aim of the present study was to examine the association between physical activity and work status in employees with cancer, and the mediating role of return to work self-efficacy (RTWSE) in this association.

methodsData from questionnaires (physical activity, RTWSE, performance status, sociodemographic), patient records, and Danish national registries (work status, education) were collected for 217 employees initiating chemotherapy for cancer. The associations of physical activity at baseline with work status at baseline and at twelve months follow-up, respectively, were estimated with logistic regression. The mediating role of RTWSE was investigated using the Sobel Goodmann test.

resultsEmployees with moderate (> 30 min/day) or high (> 150 min/day) levels of current daily activity at baseline had significantly increased odds for working at baseline (OR = 2.83, 95%CI = 0.73-10.96 and OR = 6.13, 95%CI = 1.68-22.40, respectively) and at twelve months (OR = 3.90, 95%CI = 1.19-12.77 and OR = 3.43, 95%CI = 1.12-10.51, respectively), compared to sedentary employees. Likewise, employees, physically active in their leisure time (light or vigorous psychical activity) for 2-4 h/week or > 4 h/week of light activity at baseline, had increased odds for working at twelve months (OR range = 1.20 (95%CI = 0.40-3.61)-5.39(95%CI = 0.78-37.32)), compared to sedentary employees. RTWSE was not found to mediate the observed associations.

conclusionsPhysical activity appears positively associated with work status in employees undergoing treatment for cancer in the twelve months period after initiating chemotherapy.

Indexed as

ExerciseLeisure ActivitiesSelf EfficacyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesReturn to WorkCancerPhysical activityReturn to workSelf-efficacyWork status

Identifiers

PMID33596859
PMCPMC7890631
OpenAlexW3129625373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.