Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596843›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

"The elephant in the room;" a qualitative study of perinatal fears in opioid use disorder treatment in Southern Appalachia.

Catherine Leiner, Tamara Cody, Nathan Mullins, Melinda Ramage, Bayla M M Ostrach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine LeinerUNC School of Medicine, 321 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516321, USA.
Tamara CodyMountain Area Health Education Center, 119 Hendersonville Rd, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA.
Nathan MullinsMountain Area Health Education Center, 119 Hendersonville Rd, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA.
Melinda RamageMountain Area Health Education Center, 119 Hendersonville Rd, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA.
Bayla M M OstrachDepartment of Research, UNC Health Sciences at MAHEC, 121 Hendersonville Road, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA. bayla.ostrach@mahec.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-3747
Mountain Area Health Education Center · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnoses of perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) continue to rise in the United States. Patients and providers report obstacles to OUD treatment access. Difficulties include legal ambiguity related to Social Services notification requirements following a birth to people using opioids or in medication-assisted treatment for OUD.

methodsThrough semi-structured interviews, participant-observation, and a focus group conducted in a mostly rural, region of the Southern United States (where perinatal OUD is more prevalent), patients' and providers' perspectives about perinatal substance use treatment were initially sought for a larger study. The findings presented here are from a subset analysis of patients' experiences and perspectives. Following ethics review and exemption determination, a total of 27 patient participants were opportunistically, convenience, and/or purposively sampled and recruited to participate in interviews and/or a focus group. Data were analyzed using modified Grounded Theory.

resultsWhen asked about overall experiences with and barriers to accessing perinatal substance use treatment, 11 of 27 participants reported concerns about Social Services involvement resulting from disclosure of their substance use during pregnancy. In the subset analysis, prevalent themes were Fears of Social Services Involvement, Preparation for Delivery, and Providers Addressing Fears.

conclusionsPerinatal OUD patients may seek substance use treatment with existing fears of Social Services involvement. Patients appreciate providers' efforts to prepare them for this potential reality. Providers should become aware of how their own hospital systems, counties, states, and countries interpret laws governing notification requirements. By becoming aware of patients' fears, providers can be ready to discuss the implications of Social Services involvement, promote patient-centered decision-making, and increase trust.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthChild Protective ServicesFearOpiate Substitution TreatmentPerinatal CareAdultAppalachian RegionAwarenessDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGrounded TheoryHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMandatory ReportingOpioid-Related DisordersCAPTA lawsMedication assisted treatmentOpioid use disorderPerinatal substance use treatmentSocial services

Identifiers

PMID33596843
PMCPMC7890815
OpenAlexW3129782820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.