Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596587›Full record

Trial reportPsychopathology2021

A Multimethod Examination of Sensitivity to Reward and Sensitivity to Punishment in Bipolar Disorder and Alcohol Dependence: Results from a 2 × 2 Factorial Design.

William Mellick, James J Prisciandaro, Helena Brenner, Delisa Brown, Bryan K Tolliver

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William MellickAddiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
James J PrisciandaroAddiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, priscian@musc.edu.
Helena BrennerAddiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Delisa BrownAddiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Bryan K TolliverAddiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

TREATING ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL WITH LORAZEPAM/NALTREXONEP50AA010761 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI HOWARD C. BECKER · 1996 to 2026
$46.8M
Gabapentin for Restoring GABA/glutamate Homeostasis in Co-occurring Bipolar and Cannabis Use Disorders: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Clinical MRI StudyR01DA054275 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PRISCIANDARO, JAMES JOSEPH · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Imaging Framework for Testing GABAergic/glutamatergic Drugs in Bipolar AlcoholicsR01AA025365 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PRISCIANDARO, JAMES JOSEPH · 2017 to 2022
$2.7M
Treatment of Alcohol Dependence and Co-Morbid Bipolar DisorderK23AA017666 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI TOLLIVER, BRYAN K · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA017666NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010761NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025365NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShared neurobehavioral characteristics of bipolar disorder (BD) and alcohol dependence (AD), including heightened sensitivity to reward (SR), may account for high rates of BD and AD co-occurrence (BD + AD). However, empirical research is lacking. The present multimethod investigation examined SR and sensitivity to punishment (SP) among these patient groups using a reliable and well-validated self-report questionnaire of SR and SP along with a laboratory task specifically designed to distinguish SR and SP activation.

methodsOne-hundred participants formed 4 groups: BD + AD (n = 40), BD (n = 18), AD (n = 25), and healthy controls (n = 17). Clinical interviews were administered, and participants completed the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSR-Q) and the Point Score Reaction Test behavioral task. Pearson correlations, hierarchical linear regression, and 2 × 2 factorial general linear modeling with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons were performed.

resultsBD and AD main effects were significant on self-reported SR and SP; however, BD × AD interactions were not. BD + AD individuals were significantly higher on self-reported SR than BD and AD individuals, yet all clinical groups were similar on SP. Behavioral response times did not distinguish groups nor did they associate with self-report data. DISCUSSION/

conclusionBD and AD had additive, rather than interactive, effects on self-reported SR and SP. The methods employed, paired with their application to the present sample, may account for a lack of positive findings with behavioral data.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAlcoholismBipolar DisorderCase-Control StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPunishmentResearch DesignSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesAlcohol dependenceBehavioral approachBipolar disorderPunishment sensitivityReward sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID33596587
PMCPMC8058164
OpenAlexW3132645334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.