Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596494›Full record

Trial reportPhytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology2021

Randomized placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial on the efficacy of ayurvedic treatment regime on COVID-19 positive patients.

Ganpat Devpura, Balvir S Tomar, Deepak Nathiya, Abhishek Sharma, Deepak Bhandari, Swati Haldar, Acharya Balkrishna, Anurag Varshney

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Ayurvedic Ingredients in Dermatology: A Call for Research.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Inferring Therapeutic Targets inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Ayurvedic formulations: Potential COVID-19 therapeutics?Phytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ganpat DevpuraDepartment of Medicine, National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur-Delhi Highway (NH-11C), Jaipur 303121, Rajasthan, India.
Balvir S TomarDepartment of Pediatrics, National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur-Delhi Highway (NH-11C) Expy, Shobha Nagar, Jaipur 303121, Rajasthan, India. Electronic address: chancellor@nimsuniversity.com.
Deepak NathiyaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur-Delhi Highway (NH-11C), Jaipur 303121, Rajasthan, India.
Abhishek SharmaDepartment of Medicine, National Institute of Medical Sciences, Jaipur-Delhi Highway (NH-11C), Jaipur 303121, Rajasthan, India.
Deepak BhandariPatanjali Chikitsalya, Amrapali Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur 302021, Rajasthan, India.
Swati HaldarDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Roorkee-Haridwar Road, Haridwar 249405, Uttarakhand, India.
Acharya BalkrishnaDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Roorkee-Haridwar Road, Haridwar 249405, Uttarakhand, India; Department of Allied and Applied Sciences, University of Patanjali, NH-58, Haridwar 249405, Uttarakhand, India.
Anurag VarshneyDrug Discovery and Development Division, Patanjali Research Institute, Roorkee-Haridwar Road, Haridwar 249405, Uttarakhand, India; Department of Allied and Applied Sciences, University of Patanjali, NH-58, Haridwar 249405, Uttarakhand, India. Electronic address: anurag@prft.co.in.
NIMS University · INPatanjali Research Foundation · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecific treatment for COVID-19 is still an unmet need. Outcomes of clinical trials on repurposed drugs have not been yielding success. Therefore, it is necessary to include complementary approaches of medicine against COVID-19. PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the impact of traditional Indian Ayurvedic treatment regime on asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 infection. STUDY

designIt is a placebo controlled randomized double-blind pilot clinical trial.

methodsThe study was registered with Clinical Trial Registry-India (vide Registration No. CTRI/2020/05/025273) and conducted at the Department of Medicine in National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, India. 1 g of Giloy Ghanvati (Tinospora cordifolia) and 2 g of Swasari Ras (traditional herbo-mineral formulation) and 0.5 g each of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) and Tulsi Ghanvati (Ocimum sanctum) were given orally to the patients in treatment group twice per day for 7 days. Medicines were given in the form of tablets and each tablet weighed 500 mg. While, Swasari Ras was administered in powdered form, 30 min before breakfasts and dinners, rest were scheduled for 30 min post-meals. Patients in the treatment group also received 4 drops of Anu taila (traditional nasal drop) in each nostril every day 1 h before breakfast. Patients in the placebo group received identical-looking tablets and drops, post randomization and double blinded assortments. RT-qPCR test was used for the detection of viral load in the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab samples of study participants during the study. Chemiluminescent immunometric assay was used to quantify serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) on day 1 and day 7 of the study.

resultsBy day 3, 71.1 % and 50.0 % patients recovered in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively. Treatment group witnessed 100 % recovery by day 7, while it was 60.0 % in the placebo group. Average fold changes in serum levels of hs-CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α in treatment group were respectively, 12.4, 2.5 and 20 times lesser than those in the placebo group at day 7. There was 40 % absolute reduction in the risk of delayed recovery from infection in the treatment group.

conclusionsAyurvedic treatment can expedite virological clearance, help in faster recovery and concomitantly reduce the risk of viral dissemination. Reduced inflammation markers suggested less severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the treatment group. Moreover, there was no adverse effect observed to be associated with this treatment.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentMedicine, AyurvedicAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHospitalizationHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPlant PreparationsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultPlant PreparationsAnu tailaAyurvedaCOVID-19Ocimum sanctumRandomized placebo-controlled pilot clinical trialSwasari RasTinospora cordifoliaWithania somnifera

Identifiers

PMID33596494
PMCPMC7857981
OpenAlexW3126588149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.