Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596388›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Influence of social media on parents' attitudes towards vaccine administration.

Khalid A Al-Regaiey, Wjdan S Alshamry, Reem A Alqarni, Majd K Albarrak, Rinad M Alghoraiby, Danah Y Alkadi, Leen R Alhakeem, Shahid Bashir, Muhammad Iqbal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Khalid A Al-RegaieyDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wjdan S AlshamryDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reem A AlqarniDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Majd K AlbarrakDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rinad M AlghoraibyDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Danah Y AlkadiDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Leen R AlhakeemDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shahid BashirNeuroscience Center, King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6286-6895
Muhammad IqbalDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAKing Fahad Specialist Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination has had tremendous impact on human health. The tendency to hesitate or delay vaccination has been increasing, which has contributed to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the prevalence of childhood vaccine hesitancy and social media misconceptions in vaccine refusal among randomly selected parents from October 2019 through March 2020 in the outpatient clinics of King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data were collected using a three-part questionnaire: the socio-demographic and economic questions, the Parents' Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey, and questions concerning social media use. Based on the PACV survey tool, 37 parents (11%) scored a value > 50 and were suggested as hesitant (8% hesitant and 3% very hesitant). Overall, 288 parents (89%) scored < 50, hence deemed to not be hesitant about childhood vaccination. There was no significant association between high educational level or social media exposure with vaccine hesitancy. The most commonly used social media platform was Twitter (40%). In conclusion, we report a low prevalence of vaccine hesitancy about childhood vaccination among parents, with no significant impact of education level or social media on vaccine hesitancy. Further studies are required to replicate these findings in other regions and cities to generalize these observations for Saudi Arabia.

Indexed as

Social MediaVaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccinesChildhood VaccinationPACVSaudi ArabiaSocial MediaVaccine Hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID33596388
PMCPMC8920244
OpenAlexW3130367088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.