Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596233›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Direct healthcare costs of lip, oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer in Brazil.

Vanessa Milani, Ana Laura de Sene Amâncio Zara, Everton Nunes da Silva, Larissa Barbosa Cardoso, Maria Paula Curado, Rejane Faria Ribeiro-Rotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Outpatient Dental Treatment Expenditure for Patients with Oromaxillofacial Cancer: A Cohort Study in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vanessa MilaniSchool of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Ana Laura de Sene Amâncio ZaraSchool of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Everton Nunes da SilvaUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8747-4185
Larissa Barbosa CardosoFaculty of Administration, Accounting and Economic Sciences, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Maria Paula CuradoA. C. Camargo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rejane Faria Ribeiro-RottaSchool of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-5745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficiency of public policies includes the measurement of the health resources used and their associated costs. There is a lack of studies evaluating the economic impact of oral cancer (OC). This study aims to estimate the healthcare costs of OC in Brazil from 2008 to 2016. This is a partial economic evaluation using the gross costing top-down method, considering the direct healthcare costs related to outpatients, inpatients, intensive care units, and the number of procedures, from the perspective of the public health sector. The data were extracted from the Outpatient and Inpatient Information System of the National Health System, by diagnosis according to the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases, according to sites of interest: C00 to C06, C09 and C10. The values were adjusted for annual accumulated inflation and expressed in 2018 I$ (1 I$ = R$2,044). Expenditure on OC healthcare in Brazil was I$495.6 million, which was composed of 50.8% (I$251.6 million) outpatient and 49.2% (I$244.0 million) inpatient healthcare. About 177,317 admissions and 6,224,236 outpatient procedures were registered. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy comprised the largest number of procedures (88.8%) and costs (94.9%). Most of the costs were spent on people over 50 years old (72.9%) and on males (75.6%). Direct healthcare costs in Brazil for OC are substantial. Outpatient procedures were responsible for the highest total cost; however, inpatient procedures had a higher cost per procedure. Men over 50 years old consumed most of the cost and procedures for OC. The oropharynx and tongue were the sites with the highest expenditure. Further studies are needed to investigate the cost per individual, as well as direct non-medical and indirect costs of OC.

Indexed as

BrazilCost of IllnessDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansMaleMouth NeoplasmsOropharyngeal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33596233
PMCPMC7888595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.