Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33596224›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Mistreatment of newborns after childbirth in health facilities in Nepal: Results from a prospective cohort observational study.

Ashish K C, Md Moinuddin, Mary Kinney, Emma Sacks, Rejina Gurung, Avinash K Sunny, Pratiksha Bhattarai, Srijana Sharma, Mats Målqvist

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. FIGO statement on respectful care: Addressing disrespectful maternity care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Ashish K CInternational Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0541-4486
Md MoinuddinInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5417-1284
Mary KinneySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-0161
Emma SacksDepartment of International Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Rejina GurungGolden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-4262-3543
Avinash K SunnyGolden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-9965-181X
Pratiksha BhattaraiGolden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Srijana SharmaGolden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Mats MålqvistInternational Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8184-3530
Nepal Development Research Institute · NPUppsala University · SEJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of the Western Cape · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient experience of care reflects the quality of health care in health facilities. While there are multiple studies documenting abuse and disrespect to women during childbirth, there is limited evidence on the mistreatment of newborns immediately after childbirth. This paper addresses the evidence gap by assessing the prevalence and risk factors associated with mistreatment of newborns after childbirth in Nepal, based on a large-scale observational study. METHODS AND

findingsThis is a prospective observational cohort study conducted over a period of 18 months in 4 public referral hospitals in Nepal. All newborns born at the facilities during the study period, who breathed spontaneously and were observed, were included. A set of indicators to measure mistreatment for newborns was analysed. Principal component analysis was used to construct a single newborn mistreatment index. Uni-variate, multi-variate, and multi-level analysis was done to measure the association between the newborn mistreatment index and demographic, obstetric, and neonatal characteristics. A total of 31,804 births of newborns who spontaneously breathed were included. Among the included newborns, 63.0% (95% CI, 62.5-63.5) received medical interventions without taking consent from the parents, 25.0% (95% CI, 24.5-25.5) were not treated with kindness and respect (roughly handled), and 21.4% (95% CI, 20.9-21.8) of them were suctioned with no medical need. Among the newborns, 71.7% (95% CI, 71.2-72.3) had the cord clamped within 1 minute and 77.6% (95% CI, 77.1-78.1) were not breast fed within 1 hour of birth. Only 3.5% (95% CI, 3.2-3.8) were kept in skin to skin contact in the delivery room after birth. The mistreatment index showed maximum variation in mistreatment among those infants born to women of relatively disadvantaged ethnic groups and infants born to women with 2 or previous births. After adjusting for hospital heterogeneity, infants born to women aged 30-34 years (β, -0.041; p value, 0.01) and infants born to women aged 35 years or more (β, -0.064; p value, 0.029) were less mistreated in reference to infants born to women aged 18 years or less. Infants born to women from the relatively disadvantaged (chhetri) ethnic groups (β, 0.077; p value, 0.000) were more likely to be mistreated than the infants born to relatively advantaged (brahmin) ethnic groups. Female newborns (β, 0.016; p value, 0.015) were more likely to be mistreated than male newborns.

conclusionsThe mistreatment of spontaneously breathing newborns is high in public hospitals in Nepal. Mistreatment varied by hospital, maternal ethnicity, maternal age, and sex of the newborn. Reducing mistreatment of newborns will require interventions at policy, health system, and individual level. Further, implementation studies will be required to identify effective interventions to reduce inequity and mistreatment of newborns at birth.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChild AbuseFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNepalPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33596224
PMCPMC7888656
OpenAlexW3130308950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.