Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33595827›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Critical examination of current response shift methods and proposal for advancing new methods.

Véronique Sébille, Lisa M Lix, Olawale F Ayilara, Tolulope T Sajobi, A Cecile J W Janssens, Richard Sawatzky, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Mathilde G E Verdam, Response Shift – in Sync Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of response shift on change in patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Response shift results of quantitative research using patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-regression analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Response shift results of quantitative research using patient-reported outcome measures: a descriptive systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Response shifting: a qualitative meta-synthesis on response shift.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Response shift in coronary artery disease.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Implications of the syntheses on definition, theory, and methods conducted by the Response Shift - in Sync Working Group.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  17. Health change awareness and its association with weight loss following bariatric surgery.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. An experience- and preference-based EQ-5D-3L value set derived using 18 months of longitudinal data in patients who sustained a fracture: results from the ICUROS.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Véronique SébilleUMR INSERM 1246, SPHERE "methodS in Patient-Centered Outcomes and HEalth ResEarch", University of Nantes, University of Tours, Nantes, France. veronique.sebille@univ-nantes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0780-7742
Lisa M LixDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Olawale F AyilaraDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Tolulope T SajobiDepartment of Community Health Sciences and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
A Cecile J W JanssensDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Richard SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, Canada.
Mirjam A G SprangersDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mathilde G E VerdamDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Response Shift – in Sync Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis work is part of an international, interdisciplinary initiative to synthesize research on response shift in results of patient-reported outcome measures. The objective is to critically examine current response shift methods. We additionally propose advancing new methods that address the limitations of extant methods.

methodsBased on literature reviews, this critical examination comprises design-based, qualitative, individualized, and preference-based methods, latent variable models, and other statistical methods. We critically appraised their definition, operationalization, the type of response shift they can detect, whether they can adjust for and explain response shift, their assumptions, and alternative explanations. Overall limitations requiring new methods were identified.

resultsWe examined 11 methods that aim to operationalize response shift, by assessing change in the meaning of one's self-evaluation. Six of these methods distinguish between change in observed measurements (observed change) and change in the construct that was intended to be measured (target change). The methods use either (sub)group-based or individual-level analysis, or a combination. All methods have underlying assumptions to be met and alternative explanations for the inferred response shift effects. We highlighted the need to address the interpretation of the results as response shift and proposed advancing new methods handling individual variation in change over time and multiple time points.

conclusionNo single response shift method is optimal; each method has strengths and limitations. Additionally, extra steps need to be taken to correctly interpret the results. Advancing new methods and conducting computer simulation studies that compare methods are recommended to move response shift research forward.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalQuality of LifeComputer SimulationHumansResearch DesignMethodsOperationalizationPatient-reported outcomesResponse shift

Identifiers

PMID33595827
PMCPMC8602164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.