Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33595735›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2021

Quantitative imaging of bone remodeling in patients with a unicompartmental joint unloading knee implant (ATLAS Knee System)-effect of metal artifacts on a SPECT-CT-based quantification.

Oliver S Grosser, Marcus Klutzny, Heiko Wissel, Dennis Kupitz, Michael Finger, Simone Schenke, Jan Wuestemann, Christoph H Lohmann, Christoph Hoeschen, Maciej Pech and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver S GrosserDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. oliver.grosser@med.ovgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-0734
Marcus KlutznyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Heiko WisselDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Dennis KupitzDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael FingerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Simone SchenkeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jan WuestemannDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christoph H LohmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christoph HoeschenChair of Medical Systems Technology, Institute of Medical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Maciej PechDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Christian StaerkeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael C KreisslDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg and Medical Faculty of Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Strasse 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
University Hospital Magdeburg · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSPECT-CT using radiolabeled phosphonates is considered a standard for assessing bone metabolism (e.g., in patients with osteoarthritis of knee joints). However, SPECT can be influenced by metal artifacts in CT caused by endoprostheses affecting attenuation correction. The current study examined the effects of metal artifacts in CT of a specific endoprosthesis design on quantitative hybrid SPECT-CT imaging. The implant was positioned inside a phantom homogenously filled with activity (955 MBq

resultsSignificant effects caused by CT metal artifacts on attenuation-corrected SPECT were observed for the different slice positions, reconstructed slice thicknesses of CT data, and pitch and CT-reconstruction kernels used (all, p < 0.0001). Based on the optimization, a set of three protocols was identified minimizing the effect of CT metal artifacts on SPECT data. Regarding the reference region, the activity concentration in the anatomically correlated volume was underestimated by 8.9-10.1%. A slight inhomogeneity of the reconstructed activity concentration was detected inside the regions with a median up to 0.81% (p < 0.0001). Using an X-ray tube current of 40 mA showed the best result, balancing quantification and CT exposure.

conclusionThe results of this study demonstrate the need for the evaluation of SPECT-CT protocols in prosthesis imaging. Phantom experiments demonstrated the possibility for quantitative SPECT-CT of bone turnover in a specific prosthesis design. Meanwhile, a systematic bias caused by metal implants on quantitative SPECT data has to be considered.

Indexed as

Bone remodelingHybrid SPECT-CTJoint unloading implantKnee implant systemOptimization

Identifiers

PMID33595735
PMCPMC7889783
OpenAlexW3132672717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.