Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33595671›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2021

[Molecular genetics of human hypertension].

F C Luft

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

F C LuftExperimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Lindenbergerweg 80, 13125, Berlin, Deutschland. friedrich.luft@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A genetic influence on blood pressure was demonstrated more than 100 years ago and a simple Mendelian inheritance was initially presumed. Platt and Pickering conducted a lively debate on this topic. Platt favored the idea that a single gene or only a few genes were responsible for high blood pressure. Pickering presented research results, which supported the assumption that many genes exerted an influence on blood pressure. This was all in a period when it was not even known what genes were. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) according to the Pickering model have identified > 500 blood pressure relevant gene loci, which are distributed over the whole genome. Each individual gene exerts only a small effect on blood pressure. The dark horses of hypertension research are the secondary causes. In pheochromocytoma, primary aldosteronism, Cushing's syndrome and even fibromuscular dysplasia (renovascular hypertension) the results indicate that a genetic cause regularly underlies secondary hypertension. This would therefore also partially confirm Platt's theory. In the meantime, a multitude of forms of hypertension have been described with a genetic inheritance according to Mendel. Each of these genetic variants exerts a considerable influence on blood pressure. A multitude of novel physiological mechanisms were explained by this. These findings will become therapeutically important. Therefore, it is incumbent upon clinicians to be optimally informed about these research results.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHypertensionGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic modelsGenome-wide association studyInheritanceSecondary hypertensionSingle nucleotide polymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID33595671
OpenAlexW3131618102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.