ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021
Transposable Element Mobilization in Interspecific Yeast Hybrids.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of mitotype variation and positive epistasis in trait differences between Saccharomyces species.Genetics · 2026Article
- The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation revisited.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
- Haplotype-Resolved Chromatin Conformation Data Reveals Relationship Between Transposable Elements and Chromosomal Pairing.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Patterns and mechanisms of fungal genome plasticity.Current biology : CB · 2025Review
- Article
- Loss of Heterozygosity and Its Importance in Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
- Recent insights into the evolution of mutation rates in yeast.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022Review
- A novel transposable element-based authentication protocol for Drosophila cell lines.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Reactivation of transposable elements following hybridization in fission yeast.Genome research · 2022Article
- Long-Read Genome Assembly of Saccharomyces uvarum Strain CBS 7001.Microbiology resource announcements · 2022Article
- Transposable element profiles reveal cell line identity and loss of heterozygosity in Drosophila cell culture.Genetics · 2021Article
- P-elements strengthen reproductive isolation within the Drosophila simulans species complex.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021Article
- Species-Wide Transposable Element Repertoires Retrace the Evolutionary History of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Host.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The genomic consequences of hybridization.eLife · 2021Review
- The challenges of predicting transposable element activity in hybrids.Current genetics · 2021Review
- The Structural, Functional and Evolutionary Impact of Transposable Elements in Eukaryotes.Genes · 2021Review
- Patterns of Genomic Instability in Interspecific Yeast Hybrids With Diverse Ancestries.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2021Article
- Testing the Genomic Shock Hypothesis Using Transposable Element Expression in Yeast Hybrids.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2021Article
- The effect of hybridization on transposable element accumulation in an undomesticated fungal species.eLife · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Barbara McClintock first hypothesized that interspecific hybridization could provide a "genomic shock" that leads to the mobilization of transposable elements (TEs). This hypothesis is based on the idea that regulation of TE movement is potentially disrupted in hybrids. However, the handful of studies testing this hypothesis have yielded mixed results. Here, we set out to identify if hybridization can increase transposition rate and facilitate colonization of TEs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae × Saccharomyces uvarum interspecific yeast hybrids. Saccharomyces cerevisiae have a small number of active long terminal repeat retrotransposons (Ty elements), whereas their distant relative S. uvarum have lost the Ty elements active in S. cerevisiae. Although the regulation system of Ty elements is known in S. cerevisiae, it is unclear how Ty elements are regulated in other Saccharomyces species, and what mechanisms contributed to the loss of most classes of Ty elements in S. uvarum. Therefore, we first assessed whether TEs could insert in the S. uvarum sub-genome of a S. cerevisiae × S. uvarum hybrid. We induced transposition to occur in these hybrids and developed a sequencing technique to show that Ty elements insert readily and nonrandomly in the S. uvarum genome. We then used an in vivo reporter construct to directly measure transposition rate in hybrids, demonstrating that hybridization itself does not alter rate of mobilization. However, we surprisingly show that species-specific mitochondrial inheritance can change transposition rate by an order of magnitude. Overall, our results provide evidence that hybridization can potentially facilitate the introduction of TEs across species boundaries and alter transposition via mitochondrial transmission, but that this does not lead to unrestrained proliferation of TEs suggested by the genomic shock theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.