Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33595448›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

A Novel Patient Values Tab for the Electronic Health Record: A User-Centered Design Approach.

Anjali Varma Desai, Chelsea L Michael, Gilad J Kuperman, Gregory Jordan, Haley Mittelstaedt, Andrew S Epstein, MaryAnn Connor, Rika Paula B Villar, Camila Bernal, Dana Kramer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Values elicitation among surgical oncologists: Findings from an international survey.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advance Care Planning in Serious Illness: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anjali Varma DesaiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8586-7188
Chelsea L MichaelMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9525-7591
Gilad J KupermanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4130-1577
Gregory JordanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-3470
Haley MittelstaedtMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6932-1652
Andrew S EpsteinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1808-3070
MaryAnn ConnorMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2340-7770
Rika Paula B VillarMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3346-5176
Camila BernalMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0867-1688
Dana KramerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-9236
Mary Elizabeth DavisMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3771-8289
Yuxiao ChenMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7597-246X
Catherine MalisseMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-8581
Gigi MarkoseMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-5030
Judith E NelsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3624-3111

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Communicating with Oncology Nurses about Values from the Outset (CONVO): An Innovative Primary Palliative Care Intervention in English and EspanolR21NR019188 · NINR · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI GANY, FRANCESCA M, NELSON, JUDITH E · 2020 to 2021
$487k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NINR NIH HHS R21 NR019188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has shined a harsh light on a critical deficiency in our health care system: our inability to access important information about patients' values, goals, and preferences in the electronic health record (EHR). At Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), we have integrated and systematized health-related values discussions led by oncology nurses for newly diagnosed cancer patients as part of routine comprehensive cancer care. Such conversations include not only the patient's wishes for care at the end of life but also more holistic personal values, including sources of strength, concerns, hopes, and their definition of an acceptable quality of life. In addition, health care providers use a structured template to document their discussions of patient goals of care.

objectiveTo provide ready access to key information about the patient as a person with individual values, goals, and preferences, we undertook the creation of the Patient Values Tab in our center's EHR to display this information in a single, central location. Here, we describe the interprofessional, interdisciplinary, iterative process and user-centered design methodology that we applied to build this novel functionality as well as our initial implementation experience and plans for evaluation.

methodsWe first convened a working group of experts from multiple departments, including medical oncology, health informatics, information systems, nursing informatics, nursing education, and supportive care, and a user experience designer. We conducted in-depth, semistructured, audiorecorded interviews of over 100 key stakeholders. The working group sought consensus on the tab's main content, homing in on high-priority areas identified by the stakeholders. The core content was mapped to various EHR data sources. We established a set of high-level design principles to guide our process. Our user experience designer then created wireframes of the tab design. The designer conducted usability testing with physicians, nurses, and other health professionals. Data validation testing was conducted.

resultsWe have already deployed the Patient Values Tab to a pilot sample of users in the MSK Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Service, including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and administrative staff. We have early evidence of the positive impact of this EHR innovation. Audit logs show increasing use. Many of the initial user comments have been enthusiastically positive, while others have provided constructive suggestions for additional tab refinements with respect to format and content.

conclusionsIt is our challenge and obligation to enrich the EHR with information about the patient as a person. Realization of this capability is a pressing public health need requiring the collaboration of technological experts with a broad range of clinical leaders, users, patients, and families to achieve solutions that are both principled and practical. Our new Patient Values Tab represents a step forward in this important direction.

Indexed as

User-Centered DesignCOVID-19Electronic Health RecordsHumansMedical InformaticsPalliative CareQuality of Lifeelectronic health recordhealth informaticsoncologypalliative caresupportive care

Identifiers

PMID33595448
PMCPMC7929751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.