Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33595424›Full record

ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2021

Integrating human rights into sexual and reproductive health research: moving beyond the rhetoric, what will it take to get us there?

Sofia Gruskin, William Jardell, Laura Ferguson, Kristin Zacharias, Rajat Khosla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Moving ahead together, on a foundation of rights-based evidence.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sofia GruskinDirector, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Correspondence: gruskin@med.usc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2418-011X
William JardellProgram Specialist, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5836-8674
Laura FergusonDirector, Program on Global Health and Human Rights, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-793X
Kristin ZachariasResearch Associate, USC Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rajat KhoslaHuman Rights Advisor, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of human rights principles in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) research is often recognised to be of value. Good examples abound but lack of clarity persists as to what defines rights-inclusive SRH research. To help move the field forward, this article seeks to explore how key stakeholders responsible for funding and supporting rights in SRH research understand the strengths and weaknesses of what is being done and where, and begins to catalogue potential tools and actions for the future. Interviews with a range of key stakeholders including international civil servants, donors and researchers committed to and supportive of integrating rights into SRH research were conducted and analysed. Interviews confirmed important differences in what is understood to be SRH rights-oriented research and what it can accomplish. General barriers include lack of understanding about the importance of rights; lack of clarity as to the best approach to integration; fear of adding more work with little added benefit; as well as the lack of methodological guidance or published research methodologies that integrate rights. Suggestions include the development of a comprehensive checklist for each phase of research from developing a research statement through ultimately to publication; development of training modules and workshops; inclusion of rights in curricula; changes in journal requirements; and agreement among key funding sources to mandate the integration of rights principles in research proposals they receive. As a next step, cataloguing issues and concerns at local levels can help move the integration of human rights in SRH research from rhetoric to reality.

Indexed as

Reproductive Health ServicesSexual HealthHuman RightsHumansReproductive HealthSexual Behaviorhuman rightsrightsrights-based approachrights-based researchsexual and reproductive healthSRH

Identifiers

PMID33595424
PMCPMC8011684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.