Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594836›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2021

Engineering the MSC Secretome: A Hydrogel Focused Approach.

Marissa E Wechsler, Varsha V Rao, Alexandra N Borelli, Kristi S Anseth

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Beyond labeling: differential AcRegenerative biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marissa E WechslerDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado-Boulder, 3415 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.
Varsha V RaoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado-Boulder, 3415 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.
Alexandra N BorelliDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado-Boulder, 3415 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.
Kristi S AnsethDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado-Boulder, 3415 Colorado Avenue, Boulder, CO, 80303, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5725-5691
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Osteogenic Hydrogel Niches to Promote hMSC Migration and DifferentiationR01DE016523 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI ANSETH, KRISTI S. · 2005 to 2023
$6.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic benefits of exogenously delivered mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) have been largely attributed to their secretory properties. However, clinical translation of MSC-based therapies is hindered due to loss of MSC regenerative properties during large-scale expansion and low survival/retention post-delivery. These limitations might be overcome by designing hydrogel culture platforms to modulate the MSC microenvironment. Hydrogel systems could be engineered to i) promote MSC proliferation and maintain regenerative properties (i.e., stemness and secretion) during ex vivo expansion, ii) improve MSC survival, retention, and engraftment in vivo, and/or iii) direct the MSC secretory profile using tailored biochemical and biophysical cues. Herein, it is reviewed how hydrogel material properties (i.e., matrix modulus, viscoelasticity, dimensionality, cell adhesion, and porosity) influence MSC secretion, mediated through cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions. In addition, it is highlighted how biochemical cues (i.e., small molecules, peptides, and proteins) can improve and direct the MSC secretory profile. Last, the authors' perspective is provided on future work toward the understanding of how microenvironmental cues influence the MSC secretome, and designing the next generation of biomaterials, with optimized biophysical and biochemical cues, to direct the MSC secretory profile for improved clinical translation outcomes.

Indexed as

HydrogelsMesenchymal Stem CellsBiocompatible MaterialsBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsbiomaterialscell therapyhydrogelsmesenchymal stromal cellsecretome

Identifiers

PMID33594836
PMCPMC8035320
OpenAlexW3131483672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.