Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594761›Full record

ReviewPacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE2021

Data integration for the numerical simulation of cardiac electrophysiology.

Stefano Pagani, Luca Dede', Andrea Manzoni, Alfio Quarteroni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Data integration for the numerical simulation of cardiac electrophysiology.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefano PaganiMOX-Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6662-3433
Luca Dede'MOX-Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea ManzoniMOX-Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Alfio QuarteroniMOX-Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing availability of extensive and accurate clinical data is rapidly shaping cardiovascular care by improving the understanding of physiological and pathological mechanisms of the cardiovascular system and opening new frontiers in designing therapies and interventions. In this direction, mathematical and numerical models provide a complementary relevant tool, able not only to reproduce patient-specific clinical indicators but also to predict and explore unseen scenarios. With this goal, clinical data are processed and provided as inputs to the mathematical model, which quantitatively describes the physical processes that occur in the cardiac tissue. In this paper, the process of integration of clinical data and mathematical models is discussed. Some challenges and contributions in the field of cardiac electrophysiology are reported.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacModels, CardiovascularModels, StatisticalHumansarrhythmiaartificial intelligencecardiac electrophysiologydigital twinmathematical modelsnumerical simulation

Identifiers

PMID33594761
PMCPMC8252775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.