Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594600›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021

Biotechnological potential of bacteria from genera Bacillus Paraburkholderia and Pseudomonas to control seed fungal pathogens.

Mariana Ferreira Rabelo Fernandes, Thiago Gonçalves Ribeiro, Janaína Ribeiro Rouws, Luis Henrique de Barros Soares, Jerri Édson Zilli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research Progress on the Interaction Mechanism BetweenJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Biocontrol potential of endophyticFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana Ferreira Rabelo FernandesSoil Department, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR 465 km 07, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil.
Thiago Gonçalves RibeiroEmbrapa Agrobiologia, BR 465 km 07, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil.
Janaína Ribeiro RouwsEmbrapa Agrobiologia, BR 465 km 07, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil.
Luis Henrique de Barros SoaresEmbrapa Agrobiologia, BR 465 km 07, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil.
Jerri Édson ZilliEmbrapa Agrobiologia, BR 465 km 07, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, 23890-000, Brazil. jerri.zilli@embrapa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-3488
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

CNPq 465133/2014-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal pathogens are important determinants of plant dynamics in the environment. These pathogens can cause plant death and occasionally yield losses in crops, even at low initial densities in the soil. The objective of this study was to select and evaluate fungal antagonistic bacteria and to determine their biological control capacity in soybean seedlings. A total of 877 strains from the genera Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Paraburkholderia/Burkholderia were screened, and their antagonistic effects on fungi frequently found in seeds were evaluated using four methods: quadruple plating, paired culture confrontation, strain containment, and inoculation of soybean seeds. The experimental design was completely randomized, with three replications for the first three methods and five replications in a 3 × 9 factorial scheme for the fourth treatment. The strains with the highest biotechnological potential were inoculated into soybean seeds to evaluate the biological control of fungi that attack this crop at germination. Seventy-nine strains presented some type of antagonistic effect on the tested fungi, with two strains presenting a broader antagonistic action spectrum in the seed test. In addition to the antagonistic potential, strains BR 10788 and BR 11793, when simultaneously inoculated or alone, significantly increased the seedling dry matter mass, and promoted the growth of soybean seedlings even in the presence of most fungi. Thus, this study demonstrated the efficiency of the antagonistic activity of these strains in relation to the target fungi, which proved to be potential agents for biological control.

Indexed as

AntibiosisBacillusFungiGlycine maxPlant DiseasesPseudomonasSeedlingsSeedsBacillusBiocontrolBioprospectingParaburkholderiaScreening

Identifiers

PMID33594600
PMCPMC8105491
OpenAlexW3130910620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.