ArticleWorld journal of surgery2021
A Machine Learning Approach for Postoperative Outcome Prediction: Surgical Data Science Application in a Thoracic Surgery Setting.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explainable Machine Learning for Prediction of Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After General Anesthesia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Predicting postoperative complications after pneumonectomy using machine learning: a 10-year study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- State-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods for pre-operative planning of cardiothoracic surgery and interventions: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: Transforming Diagnostics, Treatment, and Patient Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prediction model for postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic surgery with machine learning algorithms and SHapley Additive exPlanations.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Recent Outcomes and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Neurosurgery.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for Thoracic Surgeons: "The Phenomenal Cosmic Powers of the Magic Lamp".Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Influence of AI Predictive Analytics on Patient Outcomes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Lung Cancer Surgery in Octogenarians: Implications and Advantages of Artificial Intelligence in the Preoperative Assessment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The role of the diaphragm in prediction of respiratory function in the immediate postoperative period in lung cancer patients using a machine learning model.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediction of Surgical Complications: Current State, Applications, and Implications.The American surgeon · 2023Article
- Protocol for Development and Validation of Multivariable Prediction Models for Chronic Postsurgical Pain Following Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Prediction of postoperative cardiopulmonary complications after lung resection in a Chinese population: A machine learning-based study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The development of machine learning in lung surgery: A narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- Artificial intelligence assisted display in thoracic surgery: development and possibilities.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of innovative methodologies, such as Surgical Data Science (SDS), based on artificial intelligence (AI) could prove to be useful for extracting knowledge from clinical data overcoming limitations inherent in medical registries analysis. The aim of the study is to verify if the application of an AI analysis to our database could develop a model able to predict cardiopulmonary complications in patients submitted to lung resection.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data of patients submitted to lobectomy, bilobectomy, segmentectomy and pneumonectomy (January 2006-December 2018). Fifty preoperative characteristics were used for predicting the occurrence of cardiopulmonary complications. The prediction model was developed by training and testing a machine learning (ML) algorithm (XGBOOST) able to deal with registries characterized by missing data. We calculated the receiver operating characteristic curve, true positive rate (TPR), positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy of the model.
resultsWe analyzed 1360 patients (lobectomy: 80.7%, segmentectomy: 11.9%, bilobectomy 3.7%, pneumonectomy: 3.7%) and 23.3% of them experienced cardiopulmonary complications. XGBOOST algorithm generated a model able to predict complications with an area under the curve of 0.75, a TPR of 0.76, a PPV of 0.68. The model's accuracy was 0.70. The algorithm included all the variables in the model regardless of their completeness.
conclusionsUsing SDS principles in thoracic surgery for the first time, we developed an ML model able to predict cardiopulmonary complications after lung resection based on 50 patient characteristics. The prediction was also possible even in the case of those patients for whom we had incomplete data. This model could improve the process of counseling and the perioperative management of lung resection candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.