Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594513›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Oral fluoroquinolones for definitive treatment of gram-negative bacteremia in cancer patients.

Justin C Tossey, Zeinab El Boghdadly, Erica E Reed, Jennifer Dela-Pena, Kelci Coe, Sherry N Williams, Lynn C Wardlow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin C TosseyDepartment of Pharmacy, 368 Doan Hall, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1337-7328
Zeinab El Boghdadly *Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8536-350X
Erica E ReedDepartment of Pharmacy, 368 Doan Hall, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4382-7799
Jennifer Dela-PenaDepartment of Pharmacy, 368 Doan Hall, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9390-0475
Kelci CoeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1012-5512
Sherry N WilliamsDepartment of Pharmacy, 368 Doan Hall, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Lynn C Wardlow *Department of Pharmacy, 368 Doan Hall, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. lynn.wardlow@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USAdvocate Lutheran General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBloodstream infections (BSI) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. These patients often receive 10 to 14 days of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of cancer patients transitioned from IV to oral (PO) therapy compared to continuation of IV treatment.

methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adult cancer patients with gram-negative bacteremia. Patients transitioned to a PO fluoroquinolone (FQ) within 5 days were allocated to the IV-to-PO group, while the remaining patients comprised the IV group. The primary outcome was the composite of treatment failure, defined as infection-related readmission, infection recurrence, or inpatient mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to account for confounding variables. Secondary outcomes assessed included infection-related length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and adverse events, such as Clostridioides difficile infection and catheter-related complications.

resultsThe IV-to-PO group included 78 patients, while the remaining 133 patients were allocated to the IV group. Differences at baseline included more hematologic malignancy, neutropenia, ICU admissions, and higher Pitt bacteremia scores in the IV group. The rate of treatment failure was significantly higher in the IV group (24% vs 9%; p < 0.01), which persisted in the logistic regression (aOR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.1). The IV-to-PO group had decreased infection-related and hospital length of stay, as well as fewer catheter-related complications.

conclusionsThe use of PO FQ may be considered for the definitive treatment of uncomplicated Enterobacterales BSI in cancer patients.

Indexed as

BacteremiaAdministration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesBacteremiaCancerFluoroquinolonesGram-negative bacterial infections

Identifiers

PMID33594513
OpenAlexW3132670511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.