Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594476›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2021

Screening, prevalence, treatment and control of kidney disease in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in low-to-middle-income countries (2005-2017): the International Diabetes Management Practices Study (IDMPS).

Jean Claude Mbanya, Pablo Aschner, Juan J Gagliardino, Hasan İlkova, Fernando Lavalle, Ambady Ramachandran, Jean-Marc Chantelot, Juliana C N Chan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 9 countries.

Jean Claude MbanyaBiotechnology Center, Doctoral School of Life Sciences, Health and Environment, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon. jcmbanya@yahoo.co.uk.
Pablo AschnerJaveriana University School of Medicine, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan J GagliardinoCENEXA (UNLP-CONICET-CEAS CICPBA), School of Medicine UNLP, La Plata, Argentina.
Hasan İlkovaIstanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fernando LavalleFacultad de Medicina de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Ambady RamachandranIndia Diabetes Research Foundation, Dr. A. Ramachandran's Diabetes Hospitals, Chennai, India.
Jean-Marc ChantelotSanofi, Paris, France.
Juliana C N ChanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARIndia Diabetes Research Foundation · INIstanbul University · TRPontificia Universidad Javeriana · COSanofi (France) · FRUniversidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MXUniversité de Yaoundé I · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisDiabetes is the leading cause of kidney disease worldwide. There is limited information on screening, treatment and control of kidney disease in patients with diabetes in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs).

methodsThe International Diabetes Management Practices Study is an ongoing, non-interventional study of clinical profiles and practices among patients receiving outpatient care mainly by internal medicine physicians and endocrinologists in LMICs. We examined screening, prevalence, treatment and control of kidney disease across seven waves (W) of data collection between 2005 and 2017.

resultsAmong 15,079 patients with type 1 and 66,088 patients with type 2 diabetes, screening for kidney disease increased between W2 and W3 followed by a plateau (type 1 diabetes: W2, 73.7%; W3, 84.1%; W7, 83.4%; type 2 diabetes: W2, 65.1%; W3, 82.6%; W7, 86.2%). There were also decreasing proportions of patients with microalbuminuria (type 1 diabetes: W1, 27.1%; W3, 14.7%; W7, 13.8%; type 2 diabetes: W1, 24.5%; W3, 12.6%; W7, 11.9%) and proteinuria (type 1 diabetes: W1, 14.2%; W3, 8.7%; W7, 8.2%; type 2 diabetes: W1, 15.6%; W3, 9.3%; W7, 7.6%). Fewer patients were reported as receiving dialysis for both type 1 diabetes (W2, 1.4%; W7, 0.3%) and type 2 diabetes (W2, 0.9%; W7, 0.2%) over time. While there was no change in mean HbA CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationIn LMICs, real-world data suggest improvement in screening and treatment for kidney disease in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes attending non-nephrology clinics. This was accompanied by decreasing proportions of patients with microalbuminuria and proteinuria, with fewer patients who reported receiving dialysis over a 12-year period.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDeveloping CountriesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrevalenceTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultKidney diseaseLow-and-middle-income countriesMicroalbuminuria/proteinuriaReal-world studyScreeningType 1 diabetesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33594476
PMCPMC8099838
OpenAlexW3131008958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.