Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594471›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2021

Improving dose delivery accuracy with EPID in vivo dosimetry: results from a multicenter study.

M Esposito, A Piermattei, S Bresciani, L C Orlandini, M D Falco, S Giancaterino, S Cilla, A Ianiro, R Nigro, L Botez and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of EPID in vivo dosimetry in the risk management of stereotactic lung treatments.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

M EspositoS. C. Fisica Sanitaria Firenze-Empoli, Medical Physics Unit of Radiation Oncology Dept., Azienda Sanitaria USL Toscana Centro Florence, Via dell'Antella 58, 50012, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Italy. marco1.esposito@uslcentro.toscana.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-5351
A PiermatteiUOC di Fisica Sanitaria, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
S BrescianiMedical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
L C OrlandiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China.
M D FalcoDipartimento di Radioterapia, Università di Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
S GiancaterinoDipartimento di Radioterapia, Università di Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
S CillaMedical Physics Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II", Campobasso, Italy.
A IaniroMedical Physics Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II", Campobasso, Italy.
R NigroOGP S. Camillo de Lellis, Rieti, Italy.
L BotezMedical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
S RiccardiOGP S. Camillo de Lellis, Rieti, Italy.
A FidanzioUOC di Fisica Sanitaria, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
F GrecoUOC di Fisica Sanitaria, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
E VillaggiAUSL Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy.
S RussoS. C. Fisica Sanitaria Firenze-Empoli, Azienda Sanitaria USL Toscana Centro Florence, Florence, Italy.
M StasiS.C. Fisica Sanitaria, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Working Group EPID In Vivo Dosimetry of the Italian Association of Medical Physics AIFM
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITFondazione Roma · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITA. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITAzienda Sanitaria di Firenze · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Piacenza · ITAzienda Usl Toscana Centro · ITSichuan Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate critical aspects and effectiveness of in vivo dosimetry (IVD) tests obtained by an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in a multicenter and multisystem context. MATERIALS AND

methodsEight centers with three commercial systems-SoftDiso (SD, Best Medical Italy, Chianciano, Italy), Dosimetry Check (DC, Math Resolution, LCC), and PerFRACTION (PF, Sun Nuclear Corporation, SNC, Melbourne, FL)-collected IVD results for a total of 2002 patients and 32,276 tests. Data are summarized for IVD software, radiotherapy technique, and anatomical site. Every center reported the number of patients and tests analyzed, and the percentage of tests outside of the tolerance level (OTL%). OTL% was categorized as being due to incorrect patient setup, incorrect use of immobilization devices, incorrect dose computation, anatomical variations, and unknown causes.

resultsThe three systems use different approaches and customized alert indices, based on local protocols. For Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatments OTL% mean values were up to 8.9% for SD, 18.0% for DC, and 16.0% for PF. Errors due to "anatomical variations" for head and neck were up to 9.0% for SD and DC and 8.0% for PF systems, while for abdomen and pelvis/prostate treatments were up to 9%, 17.0%, and 9.0% for SD, DC, and PF, respectively. The comparison among techniques gave 3% for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, 7.0% (range 4.7-8.9%) for VMAT, 10.4% (range 7.0-12.2%) for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, and 13.2% (range 8.8-21.0%) for 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy.

conclusionThe results obtained with different IVD software and among centers were consistent and showed an acceptable homogeneity. EPID IVD was effective in intercepting important errors.

Indexed as

HumansIn Vivo DosimetryRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSoftwareError detectionOnline dosimetryOnline measurementsPortal dosimetryQuality assurance

Identifiers

PMID33594471
OpenAlexW3133271098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.