Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594415›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Deep propensity network using a sparse autoencoder for estimation of treatment effects.

Shantanu Ghosh, Jiang Bian, Yi Guo, Mattia Prosperi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Real-World Data and Causal Machine Learning to Enhance Drug Development.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shantanu GhoshDepartment of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-5429
Yi GuoDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Mattia ProsperiDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-5595

Funding

Forecasting trajectories of HIV transmission networks with a novel phylodynamic and deep learning frameworkR01AI145552 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Simone Marini, Mattia Prosperi · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
The benefits and harms of lung cancer screening in FloridaR01CA246418 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2023
$1.7M
Using Real-world Data to Assess the Burden of Diabetes in Children and Adolescents in FloridaU18DP006512 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2024
$1.4M
Using Electronic Health Records from a Large Clinical Data Research Network to Understand Cancer Burden and Cancer Risks Among Transgender and Gender Nonconforming (TGNC) IndividualsR21CA245858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2021
$773k
Optimizing the Population Representativeness of Older Adults in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Clinical TrialsR21AG068717 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2021
$419k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U18 DP006512NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246418NCI NIH HHS R21 CA245858NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI145552NIA NIH HHS R21 AG068717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDrawing causal estimates from observational data is problematic, because datasets often contain underlying bias (eg, discrimination in treatment assignment). To examine causal effects, it is important to evaluate what-if scenarios-the so-called "counterfactuals." We propose a novel deep learning architecture for propensity score matching and counterfactual prediction-the deep propensity network using a sparse autoencoder (DPN-SA)-to tackle the problems of high dimensionality, nonlinear/nonparallel treatment assignment, and residual confounding when estimating treatment effects. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used 2 randomized prospective datasets, a semisynthetic one with nonlinear/nonparallel treatment selection bias and simulated counterfactual outcomes from the Infant Health and Development Program and a real-world dataset from the LaLonde's employment training program. We compared different configurations of the DPN-SA against logistic regression and LASSO as well as deep counterfactual networks with propensity dropout (DCN-PD). Models' performances were assessed in terms of average treatment effects, mean squared error in precision on effect's heterogeneity, and average treatment effect on the treated, over multiple training/test runs.

resultsThe DPN-SA outperformed logistic regression and LASSO by 36%-63%, and DCN-PD by 6%-10% across all datasets. All deep learning architectures yielded average treatment effects close to the true ones with low variance. Results were also robust to noise-injection and addition of correlated variables. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/Shantanu48114860/DPN-SAz. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionDeep sparse autoencoders are particularly suited for treatment effect estimation studies using electronic health records because they can handle high-dimensional covariate sets, large sample sizes, and complex heterogeneity in treatment assignments.

Indexed as

Prospective StudiesBiasCausalityComputer SimulationHumansLogistic ModelsPropensity Scorebig databiomedical informaticscausal AIcausal inferencedeep learningelectronic health recordpropensity scoretreatment effect

Identifiers

PMID33594415
PMCPMC8661404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.