Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594339›Full record

ArticleArXiv2021

Pulse of the Pandemic: Iterative Topic Filtering for Clinical Information Extraction from Social Media.

Julia Wu, Venkatesh Sivaraman, Dheekshita Kumar, Juan M Banda, David Sontag

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia WuDept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Venkatesh SivaramanHuman-Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
Dheekshita KumarDept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Juan M BandaDepartment of Computer Science, Georgia State University.
David SontagDept of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Funding

Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZOU, JAMES · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the need to quickly disseminate the latest clinical knowledge during a public-health emergency. One surprisingly effective platform for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to share knowledge and experiences from the front lines has been social media (for example, the "#medtwitter" community on Twitter). However, identifying clinically-relevant content in social media without manual labeling is a challenge because of the sheer volume of irrelevant data. We present an unsupervised, iterative approach to mine clinically relevant information from social media data, which begins by heuristically filtering for HCP-authored texts and incorporates topic modeling and concept extraction with MetaMap. This approach identifies granular topics and tweets with high clinical relevance from a set of about 52 million COVID-19-related tweets from January to mid-June 2020. We also show that because the technique does not require manual labeling, it can be used to identify emerging topics on a week-to-week basis. Our method can aid in future public-health emergencies by facilitating knowledge transfer among healthcare workers in a rapidly-changing information environment, and by providing an efficient and unsupervised way of highlighting potential areas for clinical research.

Indexed as

clinical concept extractiondata mininginformation retrievalpublic health surveillancesocial mediatopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID33594339
PMCPMC7885911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.