ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2021
A meta-analysis of fluconazole for the prevention of invasive fungal infection in preterm infants.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Value of Macrogene Second-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis, Guidance of Drug Use, and Efficacy Monitoring of Infectious Pneumonia in Premature Infants.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- [Efficacy of fluconazole prophylaxis for late-onset invasive fungal infection in very preterm infants/very low birth weight infants: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of fluconazole for prevention or treatment of invasive candidiasis in Chinese young infants.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Article
- Comparing Fluconazole and Nystatin as Antifungal Prophylactics in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Oman medical journal · 2024Article
- Antibiotic and antifungal use in paediatric departments at three academic hospitals in South Africa.IJID regions · 2024Article
- [Recent research on pharmacological prevention strategies for invasive fungal infection in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022Review
- Antifungal Treatment Aggravates Sepsis through the Elimination of Intestinal Fungi.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluconazole for prophylactic use in preterm infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) by using an evidence-based methodology.
methodsA computerized literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the ISI Web of Knowledge databases, the Chinese Biomedical (CBM) database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the WanFang database, and the VIP Chinese science and technology journal database to find all the randomized controlled trials conducted between January 2000 and December 2019 that studied the prevention of invasive fungal infection (IFI) by fluconazole in preterm infants with VLBW. A meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.3 and GRADEprofiler 3.2.2 software.
resultsA total of 14 studies (including 1,930 preterm infants with VLBW) were included. The meta-analysis found that the prophylactic use of fluconazole significantly reduced the incidence of IFI (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.64, P < 0.05), overall mortality (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97, P < 0.05), and fungal colonization rate (RR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.25-0.41, P < 0.05) in preterm infants with VLBW. There was no significant effect on some common complications and neurological development in preterm infants. The application of fluconazole would not lead to the development of fungal resistance in the short term and would have no significant adverse effects.
conclusionThe prophylactic use of fluconazole significantly reduced the incidence of IFI, overall mortality, and fungal colonization in preterm infants; however, the impact of prophylactic use of fluconazole on preterm infants needs to be evaluated in a large number of clinical studies because of the limited data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33594302PMC7868852W3131577643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.