Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594162›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Altered functional properties of the codling moth Orco mutagenized in the intracellular loop-3.

Yuriy V Bobkov, William B Walker Iii, Alberto Maria Cattaneo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact of elevated COScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuriy V BobkovWhitney Laboratory, Center for Smell and Taste, and McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
William B Walker IiiDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Chemical Ecology Unit, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Alberto Maria CattaneoWhitney Laboratory, Center for Smell and Taste, and McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. albertomaria.cattaneo@slu.se.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amino acid substitutions within the conserved polypeptide sequence of the insect olfactory receptor co-receptor (Orco) have been demonstrated to influence its pharmacological properties. By sequence analysis and phylogenetic investigation, in the Lepidopteran subgroup Ditrysia we identified a fixed substitution in the intracellular loop-3 (ICL-3) of a conserved histidine to glutamine. By means of HEK293 cells as a heterologous system, we functionally expressed Orco from the Ditrysian model Cydia pomonella (CpomOrco) and compared its functional properties with a site-directed mutagenized version where this ICL-3-glutamine was reverted to histidine (CpomOrco

Indexed as

AnimalsHEK293 CellsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMothsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPhylogenyProtein DomainsReceptors, OdorantReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID33594162
PMCPMC7887336
OpenAlexW3132012612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.