Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594133›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Online and offline effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation of the primary motor cortex.

Ivan Pozdniakov, Alicia Nunez Vorobiova, Giulia Galli, Simone Rossi, Matteo Feurra

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivan PozdniakovCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya St. 20, 101000, Moscow, Russia.
Alicia Nunez VorobiovaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya St. 20, 101000, Moscow, Russia.
Giulia GalliDepartment of Psychology, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 2EE, UK.
Simone RossiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Siena Brain Investigation & Neuromodulation Lab (Si-BIN Lab.), Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology and Section of Human Physiology, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Matteo FeurraCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya St. 20, 101000, Moscow, Russia. mfeurra@hse.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that allows interaction with endogenous cortical oscillatory rhythms by means of external sinusoidal potentials. The physiological mechanisms underlying tACS effects are still under debate. Whereas online (e.g., ongoing) tACS over the motor cortex induces robust state-, phase- and frequency-dependent effects on cortical excitability, the offline effects (i.e. after-effects) of tACS are less clear. Here, we explored online and offline effects of tACS in two single-blind, sham-controlled experiments. In both experiments we used neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) as a probe to index changes of cortical excitability and delivered M1 tACS at 10 Hz (alpha), 20 Hz (beta) and sham (30 s of low-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation; tRNS). Corticospinal excitability was measured by single pulse TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs). tACS was delivered online in Experiment 1 and offline in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, the increase of MEPs size was maximal with the 20 Hz stimulation, however in Experiment 2 neither the 10 Hz nor the 20 Hz stimulation induced tACS offline effects. These findings support the idea that tACS affects cortical excitability only during online application, at least when delivered on the scalp overlying M1, thereby contributing to the development of effective protocols that can be applied to clinical populations.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdolescentAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33594133
PMCPMC7887242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.