ArticleScientific reports2021
Uncertainty quantification in the radiogenomics modeling of EGFR amplification in glioblastoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Radiogenomics and CSF-Based Liquid Biopsy Sequencing for Precision Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Predicting IDH Mutation in Glioma Patients Using Deep Learning Algorithms with Conformal Prediction.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A spatiotemporal state-inference framework for adaptive immunotherapy in glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Omics Approaches in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging in evaluating the biological features of glioma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- From Images to Genes: Radiogenomics Based on Artificial Intelligence to Achieve Non-Invasive Precision Medicine in Cancer Patients.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Biologically informed deep neural networks provide quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity in post treatment glioblastoma.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- -New frontiers in domain-inspired radiomics and radiogenomics: increasing role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification and grading following WHO CNS-5 updates.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Statistical plots in oncologic imaging, a primer for neuroradiologists.The neuroradiology journal · 2024Review
- Imaging Genomics of Glioma Revisited: Analytic Methods to Understand Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Biologically-informed deep neural networks provide quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity in post-treatment glioblastoma.Research square · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-based MRI radiomics and radiogenomics in glioma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Review
- Article
- Radiogenomics of adult intracranial gliomas after the 2021 World Health Organisation classification: a review of changes, challenges and opportunities.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Review
- Integrated molecular and multiparametric MRI mapping of high-grade glioma identifies regional biologic signatures.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI radiomics model predicts epidermal growth factor receptor amplification in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Image-localized biopsy mapping of brain tumor heterogeneity: A single-center study protocol.PloS one · 2023Article
- An image-based modeling framework for predicting spatiotemporal brain cancer biology within individual patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Advanced MRI Protocols to Discriminate Glioma From Treatment Effects: State of the Art and Future Directions.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Review
- Radiomics and radiogenomics in pediatric neuro-oncology: A review.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Radiogenomics uses machine-learning (ML) to directly connect the morphologic and physiological appearance of tumors on clinical imaging with underlying genomic features. Despite extensive growth in the area of radiogenomics across many cancers, and its potential role in advancing clinical decision making, no published studies have directly addressed uncertainty in these model predictions. We developed a radiogenomics ML model to quantify uncertainty using transductive Gaussian Processes (GP) and a unique dataset of 95 image-localized biopsies with spatially matched MRI from 25 untreated Glioblastoma (GBM) patients. The model generated predictions for regional EGFR amplification status (a common and important target in GBM) to resolve the intratumoral genetic heterogeneity across each individual tumor-a key factor for future personalized therapeutic paradigms. The model used probability distributions for each sample prediction to quantify uncertainty, and used transductive learning to reduce the overall uncertainty. We compared predictive accuracy and uncertainty of the transductive learning GP model against a standard GP model using leave-one-patient-out cross validation. Additionally, we used a separate dataset containing 24 image-localized biopsies from 7 high-grade glioma patients to validate the model. Predictive uncertainty informed the likelihood of achieving an accurate sample prediction. When stratifying predictions based on uncertainty, we observed substantially higher performance in the group cohort (75% accuracy, n = 95) and amongst sample predictions with the lowest uncertainty (83% accuracy, n = 72) compared to predictions with higher uncertainty (48% accuracy, n = 23), due largely to data interpolation (rather than extrapolation). On the separate validation set, our model achieved 78% accuracy amongst the sample predictions with lowest uncertainty. We present a novel approach to quantify radiogenomics uncertainty to enhance model performance and clinical interpretability. This should help integrate more reliable radiogenomics models for improved medical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.