Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33594049›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Base-pair resolution analysis of the effect of supercoiling on DNA flexibility and major groove recognition by triplex-forming oligonucleotides.

Alice L B Pyne, Agnes Noy, Kavit H S Main, Victor Velasco-Berrelleza, Michael M Piperakis, Lesley A Mitchenall, Fiorella M Cugliandolo, Joseph G Beton, Clare E M Stevenson, Bart W Hoogenboom and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Inferring DNA Kinkability from Biased MD Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alice L B Pyne *Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. a.l.pyne@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2658-8987
Agnes Noy *Department of Physics, Biological Physical Sciences Institute, University of York, York, UK. agnes.noy@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0673-8949
Kavit H S MainLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, UK.
Victor Velasco-BerrellezaDepartment of Physics, Biological Physical Sciences Institute, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4809-6254
Michael M PiperakisDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.
Lesley A MitchenallDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.
Fiorella M CugliandoloDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.
Joseph G BetonLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, UK.
Clare E M StevensonDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6695-8201
Bart W HoogenboomLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8882-4324
Andrew D BatesInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Anthony MaxwellDepartment of Biological Chemistry, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5756-6430
Sarah A HarrisSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. s.a.harris@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2812-1651
John Innes Centre · GBLondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GBUniversity of York · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E013074/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I019294/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004561/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/00000201Medical Research Council MR/R024871Medical Research Council MR/R024871/1Medical Research Council MR/R024871/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the cell, DNA is arranged into highly-organised and topologically-constrained (supercoiled) structures. It remains unclear how this supercoiling affects the detailed double-helical structure of DNA, largely because of limitations in spatial resolution of the available biophysical tools. Here, we overcome these limitations, by a combination of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, to resolve structures of negatively-supercoiled DNA minicircles at base-pair resolution. We observe that negative superhelical stress induces local variation in the canonical B-form DNA structure by introducing kinks and defects that affect global minicircle structure and flexibility. We probe how these local and global conformational changes affect DNA interactions through the binding of triplex-forming oligonucleotides to DNA minicircles. We show that the energetics of triplex formation is governed by a delicate balance between electrostatics and bonding interactions. Our results provide mechanistic insight into how DNA supercoiling can affect molecular recognition, that may have broader implications for DNA interactions with other molecular species.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBase PairingDNA, CircularDNA, SuperhelicalMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMolecular Dynamics SimulationOligonucleotidesDNA, CircularDNA, SuperhelicalOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID33594049
PMCPMC7887228
OpenAlexW3130709842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.